Christian Clarity Review

Where have we heard this before? Economist’s View: Insurance Capitalism and the Insurance State

Mr. X
“..and I disagree on aspects of the solution to the (insert y) problem and on many, many other issues, but his willingness to engage honestly and openly on the issues is refreshing.”

(Turns out “honesty and openly” is equal to Tax and Spend. Who knew?)

That sentence is the old “Hello” of all political discourse in the United States. Assumption: no lie can be spoken if the speaker is polite in his introductions.

Isn’t the ideal of the Leftist/Socialist’s Party, (aka the Democratic Party) supposed to be in absolute separation from the Church? Why then is it the standard practice for Church liberals to say exactly the say thing? One might get the impression that the Non-Creating Party is getting its speech from the Non-Creating Church and that is why both have a lens and agenda of non-creation and limited resources and Governmental/Church ideals based on scarcity-as-only-reality and the fear of scarcity.

What is the result of all this hugging-as-speech according to non-creating speech through the Socialists?

Through Mr. Bartlett:” Therefore, like it or not, we must travel the same route taken by the Europeans, who long before us made peace with the welfare state and tried to figure out how to pay for it with the least negative impact on economic growth and incentives.”

Again, who knew?

Here a debate over reformed or arminian theology takes exactly the same non-stance of Truth in the guise that the mere doing of speech is the same as Truth and the fellowship-of-discourse the same as faithfulness to Christ.

This sentence has become the old “Hello” of all Church doctrinal discourse in the United States.

“I have a great deal of respect for and feel no small amount of indebtedness to these men and women, many of whom have a great deal more education and facility with Scripture than do I…… (the flattery.. followed by the attack..)

But let’s have a little humility, huh? Let’s not pretend that all wisdom resides in Reformed theology or Dispensational theology or Arminian theology. Or that the throne of God is resident in Pittsburgh or Dallas or Asbury. Or at any other church, seminary, or parachurch organization espousing a particular doctrinal perspective. “

Web Search/Blog Search the phrase “..respect the right” and ‘Church’ or ‘Democrat’ or ‘Republican’
and you will find a curious thing: the very same speech reflective of the very same etiquette about many issues. Everyone, everywhere, no matter in or out of the Government or the Church seems to “respect the right” of their doctrinal/political opposers to lie in their face (according to their own world view of ‘free will’) AND that the lying should not cease but be encouraged as mere speech. And if that speech is by any means truncated (by running into the Truth), the Truth should be trampled simply to get that polite speech going again. And they cannot stop.

Supreme Court Decision Says so:

“This shift of meaning for freedom of expression was introduced by Justice Brennan in a concurring opinion in Lamont v. Postmaster General, 381 U.S. 301 (1965). Brennan tweaked the marketplace analogy to assert that the real value was
the right of the listener to receive expression.
“I find the right to receive publications is . . . a fundamental right . . . . It would be a barren marketplace of ideas that had only sellers and no buyers”(Id. at 308). “

It is then very plain that the same speech is ubiquitous over the whole of mankind: non-creating speech for its own sake irrespective of reality. The only crime amongst such persons who want you to pay for their speeches, is to truncate by any means (much less fiscal) their ‘right to hear in order to respectfully disagree’ in order to say some more non-creating words.

Psalm 12:3,4 Jehovah will cut off all flattering lips, the tongue that speaketh proud things, Who have said, With our tongue will we prevail, our lips are our own: who is lord over us?

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

What’s the connection between:

Why Hurricanes form and take the particular paths they take?

What is poverty and why does it exist?

Why the word ‘if’ is the equivalent of the word ‘hope’ is equivalent to the word ‘diversity’ the eyes of the politically active interfaith/inclusion movement?

Why psychology and psychiatry are considered genuine science such that Congress is stuided in order to successfully lobby against the people and laws passed based on their ‘findings’ and they are employed by the United States government as better medicine to those who have suffered or are suffering than Christ?

Why the truth of what reality is and how it works is in every way excluded from diplomacy of the United States of America while lies concerning how reality works and what it is are set up as ‘ideal methods’ with which to supposedly win peace?

Why do the prognosticators of false hopes automatically declare Christ false hope, tyranny and a liar while they put forward their own non-creating speech as life and a restorative of life?

It is this: the explanation/speech that speaks them. Non-creating speech.

Historically, without exception, every nation that was totally encapsualted in non-creating speech devoured itself and did so faster and faster based on its ’science’ of how the universe works and the laws/speech-of-government based on those lies. A lens and agenda of non-creation is disaster much larger than any hurricane.

By itself, no matter the intentions, the non-creatng speech will cause any people who suffer under it to die while they feel pleasure at what they do. For they fear everything but God in that their only real fear is not feeling pleasure. In running from one fear, another takes them. And all they know to do is blame their neighbor. After all, according to their own lies, they have free will and all that is done by one’s neighbor is on purpose.

Hosea 4:1 Hear the word of Jehovah, ye children of Israel; for Jehovah hath a controversy with the inhabitants of the land; for there is no truth, nor goodness, nor knowledge of God in the land.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

Can you say Purgatory?

“At their meeting on September 6, Kang told the Foreign Secretary how he had been imprisoned in Yodok camp at the age of nine for an offence allegedly committed by his grandfather. This practice of incarcerating an entire family for one relative’s misdemeanours continues today.”

Seems the Roman Catholic lie of that place where imperfect adherers to Roman Catholic lies go after they leave the flesh has caught on with the North Koreans. What seems to have caught on as well with the North Koreans is the lie that one can atone for one’s ancestors ignorance of dogma with money or ‘penance’.

1 John 4:5 They are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen