Christian Clarity Review

Anti-Christ has done a great job of supposedly genuinely dividing between “personal views” and “constitutionality” in both what is represented to be ‘liberal’ and ‘conservative’ camps. That prevailing lie says that a judge should have personal views (as unavoidable) but they should not ‘interfere’ with any decision from the bench. Supposedly, under that lie, atheist as judges would automatically preserve religious freedom because they would recognize it in the constitution verbatuum. Under that same lie, a blood thirsty pagan could recognize that abortion is murder and never under any circumstance promote abortion through Supreme Court Rulings.

But of course, very obviously the lie of “personal views isolated-from/versus proper legal judgement” hasn’t been truth and never will be truth.

In fact, that very lie of automatically abandoning one’s “personal views” when faced with legality seeks to make automatic that a professed anti-abortion soul would vote pro-abortion on the panel and that the voting against the truth of which one’s soul is very well aware is supposedly the “more fair” deed –the “more” just and a demonstration that the ‘free’ will is still intact. (notice that the seductions to supposedly demonstrate the ‘free’ will are invariably seductions to dis-obediance, not obediance to God) As has been the case with Samuel Alito who is being portrayed as the poster judge to overthrow Roe v Wade (/murder-wrapped-as-’right’ as supposed empowerment of the ‘free’ will ) and yet has consistently ruled pro-abortion in 3 out of 4 cases.

Supposedly, according to the personal view “versus” truth-of-reality lie, the Law is a black box into which one goes with “personal views” full of well intended goodness and the output is lawlessness and death as “justice” based on the inner (and supposedly infallible) workings of the box. “That’s the law”. The ‘idea’ of what-Law-is supposedly did the evil and the inner workings of that particular are supposedly just too complex to unravel or stop and must be accepted –to be a good, ‘law-abiding’ citizen. The “personal views” were most certainly unable to stop it in the case of Roe v. Wade according to that lie. Because according to that lie, those of the SCOTUS simultaneously loathed abortion and had to approve it as law just to appear ‘fair’. They ‘had’ to invent new ‘rights’-as-murder in order to keep up with the emotional-opportunity-is-the-only-life lies of their day.

Notice that those who say such lies as “personal views” versus “interpretation” seek to automatically do away with any beliefs at all. They would have society go into the same black box and by the same supposed extreme complexity of the inner workings of the box (the false determinism of anti-Christ as lens and agenda of non-creation in non-creating speech) come out the other side killing and being killed by each other through the law so manufactured and simultaneosuly still being good and upright within their souls being excused by ‘law’.

That one lie seeks to do away with any truth/justice in favor of mere prevailing deceptions in a lie/imaging of the argument between one camp of ‘original intent’ and the other of “moral evolution of the people”. Further, through it anti-Christ seeks to deceive that “present interpretation” of law is necessarily built on past precedent and that the ‘burdens on jurisprudence’ on overturning precedent/foundational-injustices-as-court-ruling would prove ‘too much for the system’. And all of it as held forth that personal faithfulness to the Truth of God of anything is the desireable traint in public officals –as long as they reject that very truth and indeed must oppose their own soul in order for genuine justice to be performed —as an automatic response of ideal/good government.

The present jurisprudence and ‘ideas’ of law have become a Satanic vacation-from-Truth black box that seeks to be its own self-perpetuating lie of legalized, unrestrained emotional opportunity of the fallen human heart, holding forth memories of the law as justice between God and man to seduce that Truth is being done yet as passing on the supposed emotional benefits “of the idea” as applied simply man to man with the result that the law has become pleasurable death. Remember that George W. Bush ran his campaign on “values” and the very personal beliefs the machine of anti-Christ seeks to do away with “when matters of law are at hand”.

< a href="http://michellemalkin.com/archives/003809.htm">Samuel Alitois now all the rage among such ‘conservatives’. But what a ambidexter that spirit he has is: turning off his “personal feelings” to vote pro-abortion. No doubt he boohooed over the “necessity” of it all as he did it.

Bluntly: will he vote to overturn Roe V. Wade and Griswold?

Yes of No?

Are we to take “on faith” that this latest pick simply had to vote the way he voted (pr-abortion) merely because he knew that to do otherwise would invite overturn on appeal to the Supreme Court ? How then will he be his own voice on the court seeing he feels bound to precedent already “in spite of his personal views”?

The “personal views” versus “how to judge” is very plainly the very same lie of “personal view” versus “political necessity” of the legislative and executive branches. We hear every day from liars in office that “their heart voted one way” but the “practicalities of politics” demanded they voted the oppose way.

Thus we have a president who actively promotes Islam as if it were truth while he says he has been “born again” and Supreme Court nominees that vote the opposite of ‘how they feel’.

The result is to muddy the waters so that no matter what questions Alito is asked and no matter how he answers, Roe v. Wade stays the same while the argument is imaged to hold out hope for actual overturn of heinous injustice and murder-as-law. Anti-Christ cries “Rain” for a land thirsty for justice while he urinates in our face.

Masons may think of themselves as builders in stone, but God very plainly says:

1 Peter 2:7,8 To you therefore who believe is the preciousness; but to the disobedient, the stone which the builders cast away as worthless, this is become head of the corner, and a stone of stumbling and rock of offence; who stumble at the word, being disobedient to which also they have been appointed.

and

Amos 5:10-12 They hate him that rebuketh in the gate, and they abhor him that speaketh uprightly. Forasmuch therefore as your treading is upon the poor, and ye take from him burdens of wheat: ye have built houses of hewn stone, but ye shall not dwell in them; ye have planted pleasant vineyards, but ye shall not drink wine of them. For I know your manifold transgressions and your mighty sins: they afflict the just, they take a bribe, and they turn aside the poor in the gate from their right.

and

Numbers 23:23,24 Surely there is no enchantment against Jacob, neither is there any divination against Israel: according to this time it shall be said of Jacob and of Israel, What hath God wrought! Behold, the people shall rise up as a great lion, and lift up himself as a young lion: he shall not lie down until he eat of the prey, and drink the blood of the slain.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen