Christian Clarity Review

So much for the lie that “if mothers and grandmothers were in charge of war it would never happen.” After all, women are very busy “following their hearts” and demanding you do the same. And according to anti-Christ through them, if you just followed your heart, supposedly there would be immediate world peace.

Excerpted from: MEMRI: Latest News

Interviewer: “Excuse me, Umm Nidal, but in the West, this scene… it’s not just that they do not understand this. They don’t understand how a Palestinian mother can rejoice at her son’s funeral, and can say ‘Allah Akbar’ when she hears that he was martyred. Not only do they consider this peculiar, but they also criticize it. They say these Palestinian women obviously have no human feelings. In other words, no mother in the world - no matter how noble the cause or how successful the outcome - would react in such a way. Much has been written about you and all the Palestinian mothers. They cannot understand such emotions.”

Umm Nidal: “They are completely detached from Islam and its concepts. But we, Allah be praised, are devout Muslims. In these matters, there is a big difference between us and them. They do not understand what Islam is…”

Interviewer: “But human beings are all the same. Our Lord created one kind of Man.”

Umm Nidal: “Of course, and as a human being, I feel these emotions very deeply. Believe me, when it comes to my sons, I am one of the most compassionate mothers. But this is a sacred duty, which no emotion whatsoever can supersede.”

Interviewer: “Is it true that during the withdrawal…”

Umm Nidal: “We cannot stop sacrificing just because we feel pain. What is the meaning of sacrifice? One sacrifices what is precious, not what is of little value. My children are the most precious thing in my life. That is why I sacrificed them for a greater cause - for Allah, who is more precious than them. My son is not more precious than his God, he is not more precious than the places holy to Islam, and he is not more precious than his homeland or his Islam. Not at all.”

[…]

Interviewer: “Some people say: Why do you prepare your sons for death, when you could be preparing them for life? I don’t mean life in the sense of pleasure, but perhaps they could do more in their lives than in their deaths. When these people see these young men, they say they might have been great military commanders or… they might have become great minds that could cause many more casualties than were caused by throwing their lives to perdition.”

Umm Nidal: “But he is not throwing himself to death or to perdition. This is not death. This is not called death. It is called martyrdom.”

[…]

Interviewer: “Recently, many operations have been carried out in restaurants and commercial centers. The world regards them very differently than operations against the military. When a bombing takes place in one of those places, the Palestinian cause is damaged worldwide.

“In Palestine itself - in Gaza and in the West Bank - people are divided over these operations.”

Umm Nidal: “All the Palestinians share the same view. They are not divided. The only ones who disagree and think otherwise are, of course, the foreigners, who have no sympathy for us or for our cause, and who know nothing about us. They are the ones who think that this man has come to kill innocent people. This is what they think. But we, as Muslims, think differently. We are familiar with the Koranic verse: ‘One who attacks you, attack him in like manner.’

“These are war necessities. How can we win otherwise? It’s true we carry out operations against the military and its soldiers, but [killing civilians] is a war necessity. They are all occupiers to begin with. Whoever comes from abroad and lives on the land of Palestine is considered an occupier, even if they are women or old people. They are all occupiers. Besides, don’t forget that they all serve in the army. They are all considered soldiers. They are all reserve soldiers.

“In addition, these people… You know this land belongs to someone else, so how can you come and live on it? Therefore, all Israelis are considered occupiers of our land. There is no difference between men and women…”

Interviewer: “But Umm Nidal, there are many…”

Umm Nidal: “They are all occupiers, and we must fight them by any legitimate means.”

Interviewer: “‘Legitimate’ is the word I was looking for…”

Umm Nidal: “All means are legitimate as long as the occupation continues.”

[…]

Interviewer: “Can’t you distinguish between operations against civilians and against soldiers, even from a psychological point of view?”

Umm Nidal: “There is no difference. This is Islamic religious law. I don’t invent anything. I follow Islamic religious law in this. A Muslim is very careful not to kill an innocent person, because he knows he would be destined to eternal Hell. So the issue is not at all simple. We rely on Islamic religious law when we say there is no prohibition on killing these people.”

Jesus Christ is revealed as smarter and smarter every day, eh?

Proverbs 28:26 He that confideth in his own heart is a fool; but whoso walketh wisely, he shall be delivered.

Proverbs 3:5-8 Confide in Jehovah with all thy heart, and lean not unto thine own intelligence; in all thy ways acknowledge him, and he will make plain thy paths. Be not wise in thine own eyes; fear Jehovah, and depart from evil: it shall be health for thy navel, and moisture for thy bones.

It is very plain that the Islamics are completely deceived that they have a sacred duty to kill their own children in the cause of “allah” and call their death “necessitated by the diety” as divine human sacrifice. Seeing that they desire to kill their own children, they will of course have no mercy on any others. They only raise sons and daughters to kill them by the means of making them “martyrs” in a false cause. They are very plainly drunk with their own blood and do not perceive it.

And they want nuclear, chemical and biological weapons.

The ones being killed by these “martyrs”? Thier families are worshipping anti-Christ such that they are bowing day and night before the false god of “erring on the side of love” and “forgiving the aggressor.” as if that is what God would do if He were in their place (very plainly God is not in them else in their own eyes, His mere Presence would violate their ‘free’ will). The use of their supposed ‘free’ will mandates they take no action while they ‘decide’ what to do later. ..and later …and later.

Isaiah 49:25,26 For thus saith Jehovah: Even the captive of the mighty shall be taken away, and the prey of the terrible shall be delivered; and I will strive with him that striveth with thee, and I will save thy children. And I will feed them that oppress thee with their own flesh; and they shall be drunken with their own blood, as with new wine. And all flesh shall know that I, Jehovah, am thy Saviour and thy Redeemer, the Mighty One of Jacob.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

Feeling persecuted for your so-called “sexual orientation”? Spain will grant you “asylum”.

Excerpted from: Telegraph | News | Spain plans to offer asylum to ’sexual refugees’

Spain is planning to give refugee status to those fleeing persecution on grounds of gender or sexual orientation in a revision of its asylum laws.

The draft law on asylum, leaked to the newspaper El Pais, would allow women facing severe persecution linked to sex discrimination to claim protection under the 1951 Geneva convention.

It would extend the same rights to homosexuals who faced serious discrimination, such as the death penalty or other severe punishment for homosexual acts, the newspaper said.

Such an overhaul would give Spain one of the most generous asylum regimes in the world.

The leaked draft said it would also become harder under the new law to reject an application on subjective grounds, such as a suspicion that an applicant was lying.

Immigration officials would be encouraged to make judgments on “strictly objective” examinations of the facts.

The new law is intended to address concerns about asylum policy raised during riots at the frontier fences separating Morocco from Spain’s North African enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla.

The Muslim sodomites want protection until they can get to the Islamic ideal of heaven where underage girls and little boys are there for no other reason than the sexual gratification of the “men”.

Spain intends to be that heaven on earth.

In the short and long term their intelligence agencies can be just like the U.S. –the NSA and CIA –filled with sodomites in sensitive positions. They can lose wars too and set up the lies of their enemies as “Republics” born of the “democratic process” as the very definition of “victory”.

————

Ephesians 5:15-20 See therefore how ye walk carefully, not as unwise but as wise, redeeming the time, because the days are evil. For this reason be not foolish, but understanding what is the will of the Lord. And be not drunk with wine, in which is debauchery; but be filled with the Spirit, speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and chanting with your heart to the Lord; giving thanks at all times for all things to him who is God and the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ,

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

Good article over at WorldNetDaily: (excerpt)WorldNetDaily: The unseen terrorism

Once again, we see law enforcement officials and the press establishment going out of their way to downplay even the possibility of terrorism. How many times have we seen it? How many times do we have to see it before we recognize the trend?

I recall how any possibility that the Beltway sniper attacks were connected with terrorism was dismissed. It turned out they were carried out by two Muslims.

I recall how a July 4 shooting attack on an El Al ticket counter in Los Angeles International Airport by an Egyptian Muslim was characterized as not connected with terrorism.

I recall the would-be bomber arrested at the Oklahoma University football game a few months ago that had no connection to terrorism.

I recall there just couldn’t possibly have been a Mideast connection to the Oklahoma City bombing.

I recall how TWA Flight 800 just blew up for no particular reason after takeoff from New York.

I could recite, off the top of my head, at least a dozen other examples of the way government officials and their accessories in the media have turned a blind eye to the obvious so as not to see the truth.

In fact, think of all the incidents – from power outages to explosions at refinery plants to thefts of munitions – in which authorities quickly dismissed any connection to terrorism, even before they had a clue as to the real cause or motive.

So why do Americans not understand the on-going terrorism happening to themselves on their own soil, much less overseas? Why are they asleep as to the danger of lies and in particular for the present what Islam really is?

The one lie of free will.

Because anti-Christ flatters them to be deceived.

Americans (the whole West actually) have been trained (filled with non-creating speech in which one word defines another and when an inconsistency appears to merely go look up the word or phrase to match it with all the other non-creating words…) that on encounter with any news regarding anything, the only thing to be done is choose whether or not to believe it as an automatic and mandatory first step before supposed self-willed action.

After centuries of being poisoned by the free will lie as “Church” in a choose-Jesus false gospel, now all they have is the worship of supposed ‘choice’, never understanding it is an outright worship of anti-Christ. Incredulity is held forth as secular wisdom. Indeed, it is a very popular lie that only simple hayseeds know what to believe and that any sophisticate worth his or her salt should not believe anything until a large group of other people approve.

They have, after all this time, finally realized that if indeed their heart can ‘choose God’, it is good enough to choose secular truth and indeed each other as being ‘in love’ and what to do when presented with any danger.

So when faced with bad news/danger, the first step of incredulity mandates no action immediately merely to keep always before the heart and mind that they have ‘free’ will. And yet the ‘power’ of ‘free’ will was the very thing anti-Christ holds forth will save them: a ‘proper use of the ‘free’ will/the ‘method’. Such speech as they have already got was supposed to be ‘used’ to talk out all the incredulity until it was gone and then they would act.

Yet the incredulity remains no matter how much blood is taken from them.

They genuinely are deceived that before they can physically be taken from the flesh, they must approve and to physically attack them is not to receive an automatic response of genuine and honest defense as God performing it through them, but merely to set off a chain of “decisions” that supposedly begins with recognizing the danger as comparing the words and images that describe it to all that came before. Then its on to a very looooo0ng process of a supposed mandatory “erring on the side of love” (wherein they are flattered that not only do they have free will, but that they ‘use it’ like God would if He were in their place (note how that makes God perpetually absent from them so He never ‘interferes’ with their ‘choice’) by being falsely forgiving/doing ‘good emotion’ towards those who are doing ‘bad emotion’ towards them ) and finally being rescued by God over and over historically, to claim God did nothing but that their “courageous” ‘use’ of their ‘own free will’ delivered them from their enemies. Having set up their own heart as god, the best of them (aka ‘the conservatives’) then do human emotion toward God as if He should get His share of what flatters them –as if He were a man–and are angered at their counterparts lack of participation in the charade.

Their ‘choice’ doesn’t mandate hesitation. It is the hesitation.

And they know this. One of the first ‘ideals’ of military training is an attempt to remove hesitation and make the appropriate action per the stimulus of being attacked automatic. If they didn’t think it existed, they wouldn’t be trying to remove it in the emergency. The more they worship ‘free’ will, the more ‘choices’ seem to present themselves to them: the more of anti-Christ they drink, the more they want of him and the more he presents himself in them as the narcotic of flattery.

It is no accident that it appears to Americans that they will do what seems to them “the ideal behavior/use of will” after the present emergency is over and the present emergency never stops. They are being driven into one disaster after the other by the very lie that seems to them to be their rescue from any present Emotional Negative.

They are deceived.

Psalm 12:2-4 They speak falsehood every one with his neighbour: with flattering lip, with a double heart, do they speak. Jehovah will cut off all flattering lips, the tongue that speaketh proud things, Who have said, With our tongue will we prevail, our lips are our own: who is lord over us?

1 Kings 18:26-40 And they took the bullock which had been given them, and sacrificed it, and called on the name of Baal from morning until noon, saying, O Baal, answer us! But there was no voice, and none answered. And they leaped about the altar that had been made. And it came to pass at noon that Elijah mocked them and said, Cry aloud; for he is a god; for he is meditating, or gone aside, or he is on a journey; perhaps he sleeps, and will awake. And they cried aloud, and cut themselves after their manner with swords and spears, till the blood gushed out upon them. And it came to pass when midday was past, that they prophesied until the time of the offering up of the oblation; but there was neither voice, nor any that answered, nor any attention. Then Elijah said to all the people, Draw near to me. And all the people drew near to him. And he repaired the altar of Jehovah which was broken down. And Elijah took twelve stones, according to the number of the tribes of the sons of Jacob, to whom the word of Jehovah came saying, Israel shall be thy name; and with the stones he built an altar in the name of Jehovah, and made a trench round about the altar, of the capacity of two measures of seed; and he put the wood in order, and cut the bullock in pieces, and laid it on the wood. And he said, Fill four pitchers with water, and pour it on the burnt-offering, and on the wood. And he said, Do it the second time. And they did it the second time. And he said, Do it the third time. And they did it the third time. And the water ran round about the altar; and he filled the trench also with water. And it came to pass at the time of the offering up of the oblation, that Elijah the prophet drew near, and said, Jehovah, God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel, let it be known this day that thou art God in Israel, and that I am thy servant, and that I have done all these things by thy word. Answer me, Jehovah, answer me, that this people may know that thou Jehovah art God, and that *thou* hast turned their heart back again. And the fire of Jehovah fell, and consumed the burnt-offering, and the wood, and the stones, and the dust, and licked up the water that was in the trench. And all the people saw it , and they fell on their faces and said, Jehovah, he is God! Jehovah, he is God! And Elijah said to them, Seize the prophets of Baal; let not one of them escape! And they seized them; and Elijah brought them down to the torrent of Kishon, and slaughtered them there.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

The end result of “higher criticism” that is being taught at every so-called institution of ‘higher learning’ and certainly as “hermeneutics” as if hermeneutics were Truth:

Excerpt of: Prove Christ exists, judge orders priest - World - Times Online

Signor Cascioli’s contention — echoed in numerous atheist books and internet sites — is that there was no reliable evidence that Jesus lived and died in 1st-century Palestine apart from the Gospel accounts, which Christians took on faith. There is therefore no basis for Christianity, he claims.

Signor Cascioli’s one-man campaign came to a head at a court hearing last April when he lodged his accusations of “abuse of popular credulity” and “impersonation”, both offences under the Italian penal code. He argued that all claims for the existence of Jesus from sources other than the Bible stem from authors who lived “after the time of the hypothetical Jesus” and were therefore not reliable witnesses.

Signor Cascioli maintains that early Christian writers confused Jesus with John of Gamala, an anti-Roman Jewish insurgent in 1st-century Palestine. Church authorities were therefore guilty of “substitution of persons”.

The Roman historians Tacitus and Suetonius mention a “Christus” or “Chrestus”, but were writing “well after the life of the purported Jesus” and were relying on hearsay.

Father Righi said there was overwhelming testimony to Christ’s existence in religious and secular texts. Millions had in any case believed in Christ as both man and Son of God for 2,000 years.

“If Cascioli does not see the sun in the sky at midday, he cannot sue me because I see it and he does not,” Father Righi said.

Signor Cascioli said that the Gospels themselves were full of inconsistencies and did not agree on the names of the 12 apostles. He said that he would withdraw his legal action if Father Righi came up with irrefutable proof of Christ’s existence by the end of the month.

The Vatican has so far declined to comment.

Now anti-Christ as the Italian legal system wants some other testimony than Word: it demands to hear any other voice than God as Word that God is Word.

These are the same people through whom anti-Christ sided with anti-Christ Hitler and out of whom grew a Mussolini, that while decrying Christianity, set up a government that said:

Thus many of the practical expressions of Fascism such as party organization, system of education, and discipline can only be understood when considered in relation to its general attitude toward life. A spiritual attitude (3). Fascism sees in the world not only those superficial, material aspects in which man appears as an individual, standing by himself, self-centered, subject to natural law, which instinctively urges him toward a life of selfish momentary pleasure; it sees not only the individual but the nation and the country; individuals and generations bound together by a moral law, with common traditions and a mission which suppressing the instinct for life closed in a brief circle of pleasure, builds up a higher life, founded on duty, a life free from the limitations of time and space, in which the individual, by self-sacrifice, the renunciation of self-interest, by death itself, can achieve that purely spiritual existence in which his value as a man consists.

The conception is therefore a spiritual one, arising from the general reaction of the century against the materialistic positivism of the XIXth century. Anti-positivistic but positive; neither skeptical nor agnostic; neither pessimistic nor supinely optimistic as are, generally speaking, the doctrines (all negative) which place the center of life outside man; whereas, by the exercise of his free will, man can and must create his own world.

Fascism wants man to be active and to engage in action with all his energies; it wants him to be manfully aware of the difficulties besetting him and ready to face them. It conceives of life as a struggle in which it behooves a man to win for himself a really worthy place, first of all by fitting himself (physically, morally, intellectually) to become the implement required for winning it. As for the individual, so for the nation, and so for mankind (4). Hence the high value of culture in all its forms (artistic, religious, scientific) (5) and the outstanding importance of education. Hence also the essential value of work, by which man subjugates nature and creates the human world (economic, political, ethical, and intellectual).

This positive conception of life is obviously an ethical one. It invests the whole field of reality as well as the human activities which master it. No action is exempt from moral judgment; no activity can be despoiled of the value which a moral purpose confers on all things. Therefore life, as conceived of by the Fascist, is serious, austere, and religious; all its manifestations are poised in a world sustained by moral forces and subject to spiritual responsibilities. The Fascist disdains an “easy ” life (6).

The Fascist conception of life is a religious one (7), in which man is viewed in his immanent relation to a higher law, endowed with an objective will transcending the in­dividual and raising him to conscious membership of a spiritual society. “Those who perceive nothing beyond opportunistic considerations in the religious policy of the Fascist regime fail to realize that Fascism is not only a system of government but also and above all a system of thought.

Fascism, to those within it (just as well as those in any niche tumor in anti-Christ-as-mind-and-language) sees itself as a total explanation for total reality and thus trumps all other word orders in the eyes of those deceived within it, even as it cannot exist but merely as one of many off-shoots of the lie of free will and non-creating speech. It is but one of God’s creatures.

Yet in its own self-deception is little wonder that it now wants ‘proof’ the non-regenerate creature can both recognize and desire to know as Truth that God is Word / Jesus the Christ while remaining the present creature with the present creature’s mind and speech.

God very plainly says the natural man CANNOT know the things of God:

1 Corinthians 2:14 But the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him; and he cannot know them because they are spiritually discerned;

Yet anti-Christ tells the natural man there is no other speech than himself and no ‘proofs’ but that exist in him as speech. Thus , when accused by anti-Christ as if there were only one speech in total reality Jesus Christ/Word of God gave it no answer.

Mark 15:3-5 And the chief priests accused him urgently. And Pilate asked him again, saying, Answerest thou nothing? See of how many things they bear witness against thee. But Jesus still answered nothing, so that Pilate marvelled.

The Romanist have long fled from God as Word. They are the progeny of ‘higher criticism’ wherein it is claimed God ‘uses human language’ to communicate with man –as if there were only one speech in total reality. They have been caught in their own trap: they had to say God ‘uses human language’ in order to keep saying the will of man is ‘free’ to ‘choose Jesus’ so the language of the Bible had to be ‘non-interfereing’ with the will to keep up that lie.

And so they have kept that lie and it has now come back to haunt them: their former victims prefer a different niche tumor of anti-Christ: one that appears to give them better emotional opportunity: atheism/no rules-ism.

Anti-Christ well knows that himself as speech can prove nothing outside of himself because he can create nothing. He cannot deliver those within him from himself –he cannot open the door. In his own mind and heart, there is no ‘outside’ of him.

Ezekiel 28:1-10 And the word of Jehovah came unto me, saying, Son of man, say unto the prince of Tyre, Thus saith the Lord Jehovah: Because thy heart is lifted up, and thou hast said, I am a *god, I sit in the seat of God, in the heart of the seas, (and thou art a man, and not *God,) and thou settest thy heart as the heart of God: behold, thou art wiser than Daniel! nothing secret is obscure for thee; by thy wisdom and by thine understanding thou hast gotten thee riches, and hast gotten gold and silver into thy treasures; by thy great wisdom thou hast by thy traffic increased thy riches, and thy heart is lifted up because of thy riches. Therefore thus saith the Lord Jehovah: Because thou hast set thy heart as the heart of God, therefore behold, I will bring strangers upon thee, the terrible of the nations; and they shall draw their swords against the beauty of thy wisdom, and they shall tarnish thy brightness. They shall bring thee down to the pit, and thou shalt die the deaths of those that are slain in the heart of the seas. Wilt thou then say before him that slayeth thee, I am God? but thou shalt be a man, and not *God, in the hand of him that pierceth thee. Thou shalt die the deaths of the uncircumcised, by the hand of strangers: for I have spoken it , saith the Lord Jehovah.

Now the priest and the whole of the Roman Catholic Church , who is deceived God is not His Word but merely ‘uses language’ and indeed, supposedly wrote the Bible in ‘human language’ and gives men ‘holy info’ thereby can only appear to be fools in the legal systems of the world.

They no doubt will take that as some genuine persecution for the Name of Jesus Christ and thus ’suffer’ like nobodies business as publically as possible to deceive as many as they can while they still have some ‘power’/'influence’ left.

We will see what God will do. May He open all their eyes. Why not? He blessed me with new creation in Jesus Christ. Why not them?

The only way to prove Jesus Christ as Word to them is for them to be born again in Jesus Christ, for God as Word to Speak through one of His true servants. It can’t be the priest. If God as Word did that, that would violate the priest’s supposed ‘free will’ and the priest wouldn’t be a Catholic anymore, he would be a real, literal new creation in Jesus Christ know to the rest of the world as a Calvinist.

Having denied Jesus Christ as Creating Word and desiring to speak their own speech, what will they do now? Their gospel has always been false. A false gospel can’t create anything. And a handicap such as not being able to debazzle with vain ceremony doesn’t bode well for making ‘new converts’ to their old lies.

God says of real, literal new creations in Jesus Christ –those in whom God non-metaphorically dwells :

Matthew 10:19,20 But when they deliver you up, be not careful how or what ye shall speak; for it shall be given to you in that hour what ye shall speak. For ye are not the speakers, but the Spirit of your Father which speaks in you.

God also says:

John 6:63 It is the Spirit which quickens, the flesh profits nothing: the words which I have spoken unto you are spirit and are life.

What will the Romanist say now? What will the Judge hear? Who is the alternate literal/impersonator of whom?

Alles klar, Herr Kommissar?

—————————–

1John 4:4-6 *Ye* are of God, children, and have overcome them, because greater is he that is in you than he that is in the world. *They* are of the world; for this reason they speak as of the world, and the world hears them. *We* are of God; he that knows God hears us; he who is not of God does not hear us. From this we know the spirit of truth and the spirit of error.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

Anti-Christ poses riddles as if some divine answer to “the problem of not getting along together” and disguises his riddle as angst over ‘multiculturalism’: how can truth and lies get along together? Can such a ’secular’/'meta’ be forced to exist? Can it be chosen? Isn’t that what man has been calling ‘civilization’ all these thousands of years? If it is an engine what does it do? If it is a bomb, what does it destroy? If it is alive, what does it want?

How does anti-Christ pose these riddles as if by the mere posing of them some good has been demonstrated?

By thinking out loud through Rushdie at the Times on the problem of ‘multiculturalism’:

…When we, as individuals, pick and mix cultural elements for ourselves, we do not do so indiscriminately, but according to our natures. Societies, too, must retain the ability to discriminate, to reject as well as to accept, to value some things above others, and to insist on the acceptance of those values by all their members. This is the question of our time: how does a fractured community of multiple cultures decide what values it must share in order to cohere, and how can it insist on those values even when they clash with some citizens’ traditions and beliefs?

The beginnings of an answer may be found by asking the question the other way around: what does a society owe to its citizens? The French riots demonstrate a stark truth. If people do not feel included in the national idea, their alienation will turn to rage. Chouhan and others are right to insist that issues of social justice, racism and deprivation need urgently to be addressed. If we are to build a plural society on the foundation of what unites us, we must face up to what divides. But the questions of core freedoms and primary loyalties can’t be ducked. No society, no matter how tolerant, can expect to thrive if its citizens don’t prize what their citizenship means — if, when asked what they stand for as Frenchmen, as Indians, as Britons, they cannot give clear replies.

The problem is that to face up to what divides is not possible by fallen man even though fallen man’s speech can’t stop asking the question of what “it” is in the middle of feeling emotions and speaking words as if some combination of the three must sooner or later end up as answer; as if merely talking it out would eventually end up as cure. Thus the worship of anti-Christ in the guise of needing to demonstrate an ability that does not exist: freedom of will in freedom of speech.

The fall itself was simply the replacement of God as Word with anti-Christ as non-creating speech. Now that fallen man is completely encapsulated in a speech that create nothing, his only lens and agenda is scarcity/not-enough and death: non-creation. Everything from his ‘understanding’ of the universe (Darwinism/evolution –nothing more than a validation of the speech that speaks non-creation and therefore seems to necessitate some other explanation/non-creating word order than outright creation as an act of speech from nothing of how things are and came to be that way) to his attempt to simultaneously worship mere speech as supposedly necessitating the protection and inclusion of any word order that can be strung together as being ‘fortuitously encountered’ and yet ‘discriminate’ amongst the variously encountered word orders as truth or lies with assigned values as such are anti-Christ. His mind is non-creating. His speech is non-creating. His thoughts and desires are non-creating. Thus he can never be satisfied.

Ephesians 4:17-19 This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye should no longer walk as the rest of the nations walk in the vanity of their mind, being darkened in understanding, estranged from the life of God by reason of the ignorance which is in them, by reason of the hardness of their hearts, who having cast off all feeling, have given themselves up to lasciviousness, to work all uncleanness with greedy unsatisfied lust.

Yet he hopes he will be satisfied one day in the future. It will supposedly be an event: satisfaction. In his non-creating/not-enough mind that is anti-Christ, he desires only to build up emotional opportunities around him, a well of supposed cures to dissatisfaction and some combination of what is in the well will supposedly save him one day. He hears of lies and feels them good so as to turn them into opportunity and is further ensnared and does not perceive it. He trades on truth for one lie and sees nothing has changed. He is religious today for one deity and another tomorrow; then an atheist in the end. He writes books on some particular of the mix/kaleidoscope view he sees and argues vehemently when another has a different ‘view’ from the same well. He is deceived he desperately needs the well with all its mixed wine to find the cure for dissatisfaction. He must have his multi-‘culturalism’ as it seems to him to be the untouched jungle/garden from which the miracle cure will one day be discovered.

Yet within them all with the one exception of true Christianity, they are all non-creating. Trillions of incantations and mixed phrases within it can and are spoken every day. There is no end to the algorithms mixed to get a new order and say it and hear it. The powerless words are the money/medium of exchange of the emotional economy of the world that buys everything but salvation from it. The whole is powerless. They are mere idols of sound and sight: a plastic god always nodding yes.

Psalm 115:4-8 Their idols are silver and gold, the work of men’s hands: They have a mouth, and they speak not; eyes have they, and they see not; They have ears, and they hear not; a nose have they, and they smell not; They have hands, and they handle not; feet have they, and they walk not; they give no sound through their throat. They that make them are like unto them, –every one that confideth in them.

Note the question is the common one these days and is set up so as promote and sustain the lie of free will and that the foundation of the lie of free will: (”pick…choose…”) that only one speech exists in total reality and it is non-creating (and thus non-’interfering’ with the will) –that ‘we’ are all in a box of not-enoughness and yet that is all there is. Supposedly, not only are we, by divine fiat forced to ‘use our free will’, but do so as competeing with our neighbor and as fighting very loosely and lyingly defined inner demons that have nothing to do with speech over a better slice of the only steak around; that is to say, the only emotional opportunity around, or as anti-Christ says “what society owes its citizens and what its citizens owe society” as if creatures had free will.

Do Rushdie or any of his contemporary thinkist of the mind of anti-Christ know that it is anti-Christ who speaks through them in such writings, which in their mind are well intended and for the good (of course) and that discourse is the solution to all problems? Of course not. Anti-Christ to such as they is always elsewhere as the ultimate evil. Anti-Christ is to them Emotional Negative that has free will ‘too’ and thus the source of all Emotional Negatives: the invisible enemy in one’s neighbor that must be talked out into the open and conquered.

Anti-Christ through Rushdie poses a question as if a riddle, then seems to force choice at the end as a solution to the problem of how ‘we’ are to use the ‘free’ will as answer. His only answer is always to ‘keep’ ‘using’ the ‘free’ will as if it were really free and his speech the one speech in total reality. That the will is not free, that we do not at all make the future and that Jesus Christ is a separate and distinct Word from anti-Christ is the fly in the soup of worldly/multiculturalist hopes.

How will Rushdie and company grasp Jesus Christ as Creating Speech? How will the reader grasp what is in front of them? By letting go of the speech they grew up in: all its knowledge; all its understanding; all its rules of how and why; all its wisdom: to become a child.

To do so is to be free from desire itself: to see Satan’s merchandise as the evil it really is and to know that ‘multi’-culturalism is nothing more than anti-Christ as single-speechism and the pretence to unite something that is not disparate, even given there are niche tumors in anti-Christ’s one mind that fight against one another and the whole: all of it is non-creating speech. It is to see the same speech by which the Russians both formed (as the Authorities) and took to the Gulags (as prisoners). It is not Russian. It is the same speech by which the Germans formed the death camps (as the Authorities) and those who were killed therein spoke as false hope of delivery from them. (They had long ago been caught in it and it only worked itself out as the fruit of their own mouth.)

Yet there is no free will because there are two speaks in total reality: God is One/Word, anti-Christ is the other. One is God/Jesus Christ, the other a living creature that has deceived all those it has devoured even as it speaks out through them until the end. The only salvation from that speech/mind of anti-Christ is actual new birth in Jesus Christ, by which God will perform on you the sign of the Prophet Jonah in that Bel is anti-Christ:

Jeremiah 51:44,45 And I will punish Bel in Babylon, and I will bring forth out of his mouth what he hath swallowed up; and the nations shall not flow together any more unto him: yea, the wall of Babylon is fallen. Go ye out of the midst of her, my people, and deliver every man his soul from the fierce anger of Jehovah!

And God will say to you, after you have been cast out of the mouth of your former speech and cut off from the world that is still inside it:

Ezekiel 16:4-8 And as for thy nativity, in the day thou wast born thy navel was not cut, neither wast thou washed in water for cleansing; thou wast not rubbed with salt at all, nor swaddled at all. No eye pitied thee, to do any of these unto thee, to have compassion upon thee; but thou wast cast out in the open field, from abhorrence of thy person, in the day that thou wast born. And I passed by thee, and saw thee weltering in thy blood, and I said unto thee, in thy blood, Live! yea, I said unto thee, in thy blood, Live! I caused thee to multiply, as the bud of the field; and thou didst increase and grow great, and thou camest to fulness of beauty; thy breasts were fashioned, and thy hair grew: but thou wast naked and bare. And I passed by thee, and looked upon thee, and behold, thy time was the time of love; and I spread my skirt over thee, and covered thy nakedness; and I swore unto thee, and entered into a covenant with thee, saith the Lord Jehovah, and thou becamest mine.

That actual new birth is to hear God as Word. To gain the indwelling Word/Jesus Christ.

John 1:1-5 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.

Romans 10:17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.

2 Corinthians 5:17 So if any one be in Christ, there is a new creation; the old things have passed away; behold all things have become new:

1 Peter 1:23 being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the living and abiding word of God.

You will either be born again as hearing God, Jesus Christ as Word or you will love your old speech which is anti-Christ.

Luke 16:13 No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.

The whole of all contention is the difference between the two speaks. If you love the speech of this world and yet you think to be a “religious and political conservative” you are of anti-Christ and will end up, no matter where you start, in a drive for satisfaction and the supposed necessity of a lot of words to ‘pick’ from to get that satisfaction as a multiculturalist. You will set up what you call a lie today next door to you so that you can specifically choose it as truth tomorrow simply to prove you’ve got free will and freedom of speech. You will worship such sentences as “I’m open minded to new ideas” as idols that protect your supposed free will.

Then you will turn around a few decades later and say, as the French do now, “How did this happen to us?” And no matter what you say, you won’t be satisfied. So you will question the lies you set up next door and the ones you left and yet will go in search of more to start over with because your only wisdom will be to experiment with words in a hunt for satisfaction and the only Word you will hate in that hunt is Jesus Christ and His brethren: anything that even remotely appears to get in your way of the hunt for satisfaction. You will only see those who are real, literal new creations in Jesus Christ as the kings of fools who keep saying there is another speech and you will say to us: “Huh? Nothing you say makes any sense according to all that is called sense.” –even as you perfectly understand that God as Word does away with the whole lie of ‘culture’ and that there are no cultures at all. As your life and love will be plastic, you will probably love plastic flowers over real ones and the ‘idea’ of love and marriage rather than the real thing.

————–

There is only Truth and lies: God as Word/Jesus Christ as Truth/Way/Life or anti-Christ as non-creating speech/lies/alternate literal of God.

1 John 4:5,6 They are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them. We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.

Psalm 146:3,4 Put not confidence in nobles, in a son of man, in whom there is no salvation. His breath goeth forth, he returneth to his earth; in that very day his purposes perish.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen