George Bush, Them and Anti-Christ
It never stops: Wickedness and lies held up as mere ‘bad, ‘free’ willed judgment’ on the part of the President.
Mr. President has not ‘made a bad judgment call.” –as in ‘used his free will improperly’. Mr. President has fundamentally been deceived that demons grouped into sound bites as multiculturalists slogans of anti-Christ should be the forced speech of “our” government. He is genuinely deceived that one of our “core values” is the inclusion of lies as if truth and that in that “core value” he is bound as if by higher law to “include” Islamist in everything, indeed to prefer them over true Christians as a functional religious ‘duty’ as he worships night and day at the altar of Multi-everything.
His ‘inclusion’ is his god.
Suddenly security is to be swept aside by political correctness/worship of ‘inclusion’ and the erroneous, self-deceiving emotional mathematics of manipulating the ‘hearts and minds’ of enemies.
The enemies, Islam, isn’t manipulated at all and yet Mr. President is deceived a polite smile and handshake is the same as truth from those deceived the demon “allah” is God.
They don’t know what he is saying, he doesn’t know what they are saying and the three of them (him, them and anti-Christ) are coasting toward total war before the lake of fire in a luxury yacht on a sea of lies.
Yet even those who see the folly, (that is, the wickedness) of port insecurity keep claiming it is not wickedness, but mere naive sentimentality held forth as presidential prestige.
There is a outright effort on the part of anti-Christ to cast the survival as a nation of the United States of America not as gift of grace of God as righteousness, but as a supposed spiritual neutrality that must not be violated else …something bad will happen. Those steeped in anti-Christ as multiculturalism and pluralism are slowly waking up that the multiculturalism and pluralism is poison and yet known not how to fight it except through ‘common sense safety arguments’. They have not understood that the multiculturalists lies have poisoned the youth so that looking around at the job insecurity, the lifestyle of seniors, the everyday world awash in lies and double speak, they aren’t that impressed with mere survival.
What used to work as supposed ‘motivation’ to fight the fight (the common sense of staying alive) is no longer effective. Those who try to appeal to a sense of value of one’s personal life and by extension the life of the country have not seen that the very lies “included” all these years were devices to undermine the very love of life to which they are now appealing.
To go on and on about the ‘common sense’ of mere ’security’ is not enough to override the poison that was ‘included’ as multi-culturalism. The sanctity of life has been undermined by a lens and agenda of non-creation and death: the glorification of death and sex in Hollywood, Roe v. Wade, euthanasia-speak and now blowing oneself up for one’s ‘idea’ — in the instance of late –for ‘God’.
The eroding of the sanctity and value of life in the minds of the people was always the danger and the standard reply was and has been “all speech is good!”
So here we are, with the President genuine deceived that an enemy AS false religion is not an enemy BECAUSE it is a religion. He is merely aping, as anti-Christ does it through him, what he was taught and has taught all these years. And those who oppose his policies that are wickedness, are loath to call them what they are: wickedness –not mere ’stupidity’ or mere ‘mistakes’.
Here, Robert Spencer writes a good article while skirting the issue:
excerpted from: Jihad Watch
It’s shaping up to be a major political battle: Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, House Speaker Dennis Hastert and House Majority Leader John Boehner have all lined up against President Bush’s plan to turn over operation of six major American ports to a company based in the United Arab Emirates.
The President is threatening to veto any attempt to block the plan. Referring to the fact that the company in question, the Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company, has been British-owned up to its impending sale to Dubai Ports World, he said Tuesday: “I want those who are questioning it to step up and explain why all of a sudden a Middle Eastern company is held to a different standard than a Great British company. I am trying to conduct foreign policy now by saying to the people of the world, ‘We’ll treat you fairly.’”This is staggeringly unrealistic, and reflects the dangers of the Administration’s continuing unwillingness or inability to come to grips with the full dimensions of the jihad threat. That Bush feels compelled to say “to the people of the world, ‘We’ll treat you fairly’” betrays a peculiar insecurity where he should display a robust and unapologetic self-confidence. He is trying to demonstrate to a world awash in anti-Americanism that America is not as bad as all that, but in doing so he only lends credence to the anti-American charges (for if there weren’t substance to them, after all, why would he feel the need for the gesture?) and manifests the mistaken belief that “they hate us” because of something we have done, which we can undo with the proper display of good will. In this he again shows complete unawareness of the jihad ideology which remains constant while the pretexts and grievances that fuel it shift. No amount of good will can possibly efface the jihad imperative to subjugate the world under the rule of Islamic law, which is the avowed program of jihadists everywhere.
…
After all, no one even in Washington is yet even asking the right questions of self-proclaimed moderates about where they really stand on jihad and Sharia issues. Officials in Washington and Europe have shown no awareness of the fact that it isn’t enough to have no ties to terror groups; a Muslim who nonetheless believes in the jihad ideology of Islamic supremacism and the subjugation of infidels is still susceptible to jihadist recruitment. Is it possible to determine whether such recruitment is likely or not in the case of any particular individual? No — and that’s why turning over any ports to Dubai Ports World is ill-advised: the potential for jihadist infiltration is just too great. Why is a Middle Eastern company held to a standard different from that to which a British company is held? Obviously a British firm these days could employ a jihadist also, but the likelihood of this is smaller, as British Muslims still constitute a small minority of the population.
Some have argued that this deal has been blown way out of proportion, and that security for the ports will remain in American hands. Even if that is true, however, the arrangement with Dubai Ports World should be ended immediately, if only for its symbolic value. Rather than bend over backward to show the Muslim nations of the world that he trusts them, President Bush would do more for American national security by explaining why such trust would be misplaced at this time, and calling upon those nations to manifest their trustworthiness with forthright and unambiguous anti-jihad actions within their borders — including an ending of all discrimination against non-Muslims and of the teaching of the idea that the Islamic social order must be imposed by force over Jews, Christians, and others. If the President were calling for the UAE to adopt such measures, he would be under no illusions about where that country really stands.
even as far as the “survival is common sense” argument goes:
Mr. Spencer fails to mention that the task of security is much greater with foreign control of a port than with American control and much greater still with Islamic control of the ports.
Plainly the Coast Guard will have to work much harder than with other ports to SECURE the port. The port is not assumed to be SECURE until proven otherwise. It isn’t being charged with a crime and is not ‘innocent until proven guilty’. We are on a war footing. It is simply real estate on which criminal, wicked activity has to be stopped with the assumption that that activity is on-going, not with the assumption that that activity is absent.
When you guard something in reality, you guard real estate you have taken and secured, not real estate you have not. There is no assumption of safety in war in real estate you do not activity occupy and patrol.
The Bush administration is not even engaging in the war with the equal purity of veracity in which the enemy is attacking. He keeps trying to present the war as a mere business as usual minor conflict.
Mr. President is taking the face value of UAE words and quite forgets we on a war footing, not a lazier faire, internationalist, forcing of multiculturalism, drinking of lies/business as usual footing.
Taking the steps to insure the Islamics are contained and the port secure, knowing in advance the Islamics will use the legal system against us to shout “discrimination!” as loud and as long as possible to obscure what they are doing while the left tries day and night to hamper the FBI and the whole government from oversight is being compounded and exponentially adding to the effort required to secure the ports. That is so obvious that to state it is to engage in a certain level of obnoxiousness for its redundancy.
Yet poisoned by the implanted, multi-generational device of “inclusion” and “multi-culturalism” as watering down even the common sense of the survival one’s own culture and one’s own family in favor of the theoretical survival of another simply because it is another, not only the Bush Administration but even his most honest critics rely on what is no longer reliable.
Insecurity of the nation is wickedness and sin against God, besides treason. Not ever wanting to mention the Name of Jesus Christ in favor of bowing day and night before the name of a demon who hates God and has deceived and murdered millions of souls is costing not only George Bush, but the whole of the United States of America. It not only cost them Truth in the soul and spirit and eternal life but survival in the physical as it deprives them of any genuine defense and eyes to see who the enemy is: anti-Christ as the non-creating speech they love to speak to each other day and night and that which makes them feel as if they are “somebody” and “in charge” of something. You know, ‘free’ willed ‘decision’ makers.
—————–
Jeremiah 2:29 Wherefore would ye contend with me? Ye all have transgressed against me, saith Jehovah.
2 Chronciles 19:2 And Jehu the son of Hanani, the seer, went out to meet him, and said to king Jehoshaphat, Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate Jehovah? Therefore is wrath upon thee from Jehovah.
In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen
Am I now come up without Jehovah against this place to destroy it? Jehovah said to me, Go up against this land and destroy it. 2 Kings 18:25
Anti-Christ tried the lie that God had sent him to conqueor Jerusalem through the Assyrians. But God says to the worshipers of demons who hate Jesus Christ and Israel: "But I know thine abode, and thy going out, and thy coming in, And thy raging against me." 2 Kings 19:27