Christian Clarity Review

Ever heard this: “He (or She) was a fine intelligent and good looking creature. But ever since the accident…?”

The free will lie has been devastating towards all equally as death, not just those regarded as ‘mentally challenged’. Indeed, the whole of the ‘mentally challenged’ lie is that human beings have free will and self-derive their own thoughts IF they have the organics/flesh to go with it in the right way. To men, the free will lie in order to appear not-a-lie but ‘wisdom’ needs a very particular mix and fit as ever-present in the minds of men of: non-creating/’non’-interfering-with-the-will speech; self-derived thoughts as that speech; flesh operating at some peak performance that accomidates self-derived thoughts exclusively; a population of such who speak non-creating/non-interfering-with-the-will speech exclusively among themselves and to each other; total absence of any enemy men cannot see and have certainty exists.

Men simply never notice that not only does that mix as lies exist in the exact balance necessary, (the same way the earth exists such that it has a breathable atmosphere and very particular parameters necessary for fleshly organics to prosper in it and that if one of those parmeters is off by even a tiny bit the flesh could not exist on earth…) but that the free will lie exists anyway among them even without that mix as the source of the lie and as the unseen and unknown enemy, and that it never grows old and is immortal and is the same speech their fathers spoke all the way back to the fall of Adam –that it is a living creature that has devoured them all. Men live whole lives and never notice their own speech cannot create anything and that they are encapsulated in non-creating speech. They know it but never notice that they know it.

The whole lie of ‘why’ Terri Shiavo had to die (as in forcing her starvation and murder for over two weeks as ‘medical common sense’…) while she both spoke and moved was that her movement and her speech were not the generally accepted avenues that prove free will and thus she was ‘brain dead’. Thus, in their eyes, it would have been and would be ‘cruelty’ (violence against their own ‘free’ willed emotions) to let anyone live minus on-going evidence of intact and functioning ‘free’ will. ‘The accident’ moved her just a bit to the left or right of that rigourous mix and fit of self-derived thoughts, flesh, ‘free will’ and non-creating speech.

She lived anyway, life refuting the lie to their face.

And that was the offense.

Supposedly, in the eyes of her murderers and tormentors, her genuine displacement from the standard model of self derived thoughts, ‘free’ will, intact and perfectly functioning flesh and non-creating speech made her less than they. They supposedly had abilities that she did not and thus the mere presence of their abilities was the proof she had to die. They supposedly had the organics, the correct shapes of cells and DNA to ‘go on’ in ‘free’ will wereas she supposedly started out with those shapes but ‘the accident’ did away with the abilities as changing the shape of the organics/flesh. Her continued breathing was an offense to their ‘common sense’ and supposed educational superiority. Their ‘agenda’ per se was themselves and the spread of their lies as ‘common sense’.

Thus, the flesh rules all while the soul and spirit is killed as if not even existing. Those with ‘birth defects’ who do not evidence an immediate obeisance to the non-creating speech and thus the lie of ‘free’ will are judged by those deceived they have ‘free’ will to be ‘less’ .

Now it is even worse: those judged to be with the same shapes as possessing the same organics and flesh, perfectly operating ‘free’ will with all the right parameters and non-creating speech BUT who do not ‘use’ that ‘free’ will in the same way (as in feeling the same about the same issues at the same time) are to be killed as ‘Mercy’. Now the violence done to the heart (as in even the possibility of watching others live a life that ignores the ‘emotional values’… ) of those who are deceived they have ‘more’ ability and thus ‘more’ ‘free’ will is enough to slay them. Now there is no need for an accident; no need for a shape change of the organics; only a need for the invisible to made manifest just a bit to the left or right of the ‘acceptable and standard’ proofs of ‘free’ will.

Death started out as the ‘free’ will lie with all its ‘freedoms!’. Then came the ‘common sense’ that those with shape changes of the flesh either by ‘birth defect’, ‘accident’ or mere perception could not have the same thoughts and thus were ‘less’ than those whose shapes of brains and cells within them were a bit different. Then came “Well how do you know the shape of the other person’s brain so that you could know if you should be superior or less than the other person?” “I know. We’ll tell by how they feel about the same issues we feel about. If they feel any differently –we’ll Know.”

In the end, as always, those starting out as Freedom! lovers as ‘common sense’ have become the emotional police that no longer even bother being the Secret emotional Police that seeks to kill anyone that is off by the smallest measure of that very particular mix and fit of: non-creating speech/’non’-interfering-with-the-will-speech; organics and flesh operating in some pre-defined and idealized zone of efficency; self derived thoughts as the speech and in perfect fit with the flesh; a population of those who are all the same and who speak the same speech; total absence of an enemy they can neither see nor even know exists –to which has now been added–; feeling exactly the same way at exactly the same time on exactly the same issues.

Standards, my boy. We must have standards to be comrades. Who are we if we have no standards? Remember? “I for you and you for me and all of us together!”

———————————————————————-

Jeremiah 12:5 If thou hast run with footmen, and they have wearied thee, how wilt thou then contend with horses? And if in a land of peace thou thinkest thyself in security, how wilt thou then do in the swelling of the Jordan?

Isaiah 49:24-26 Shall the prey be taken from the mighty? and shall he that is rightfully captive be delivered? For thus saith Jehovah: Even the captive of the mighty shall be taken away, and the prey of the terrible shall be delivered; and I will strive with him that striveth with thee, and I will save thy children. And I will feed them that oppress thee with their own flesh; and they shall be drunken with their own blood, as with new wine. And all flesh shall know that I, Jehovah, am thy Saviour and thy Redeemer, the Mighty One of Jacob.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

Article at Brussels Journal on a speech given by Czech President Vaclav Klaus gets it wrong while trying to present conservatism as functional secularism, the very thing Mr. Klaus tries as a defense against the genuine evil of ‘Europeanism’:

“Mr Klaus stressed that the nation-state “is an unsubstitutable guarantor of democracy (opposite to all kinds of ‘Reichs,’ empires and conglomerates of states).” …

[…] We need a system of ideas which must be based on freedom, personal responsibility, individualism, natural caring for others and a genuinely moral conduct of life.”

Mr. Klaus tries to hang on to the lie of free will in the hopes of the comrades it may make him while speaking against the inevitable consequences of that very lie as if the consequences were of some other than the lie.

Nations do not guarantee anything, much less the ‘freedom’ that is implied by the word ‘democracy’. Nations are not entities separate and distinct from the people. ‘Ideas’ as supposed non-living neutral ‘things’ that are not-people as well guarantee nothing. Even the people are not guarantors of anything. Therein is the problem: they are deceived they are indeed the source and guranatorous Rex of everything.

Their speech deceives them.

The difference between true liberty and false hopes of an alternate literal “liberty” delivering mere emotional goods to the fallen human heart is that true liberty, even in this temporal world is exclusively achieved in new birth in Jesus Christ and as a consequence understanding that the lie of free will is a lie and that all speech of non-creating speech ends in violence and non-creation (abortion, sodomy, Pure Consumption, war..), evils far beyond the truth that they are emotional negatives to the fallen human heart to which they happen. The anti-Christ/non-creating speech of sin that speaks the free will lie is replaced in new birth (as the definition of that new birth/regeneration) with the Spirit of Jesus Christ, the Holy Spirit of God.

In trying to build up the alternate literal ‘liberty’ of non-creating speech without new birth in Jesus Christ, (Who Is a different word than they have already got), those encapsulated in non-creating speech can never supersede their own speech, the limitations of it, the ‘common sense’ of it and their own powerlessness; yet they cannot stop pretending that they are masters of all and have Real common sense as a product of their supposed freedom and power.

Mr. Klaus, like many, seeks that very particular ‘freedom’ (that is merely one among many alternate literals of the True) that never ‘interferes’ with his free will and by extension the ‘free’ will of the people. He is a Secularist/humanist/free willer/deceived one, whose best honesty is the lie that he can and must live a moral life IN ORDER to have the benefits of ‘liberty’ as emotional positives for his heart he has in common with all fallen men. So he wants the ‘Liberty’ to (drumroll…) ..live that moral life. He wants to dance between ‘religion’ as a supposed brake on the extremes of the free will through governance and ‘nation/politics/governance’ as a supposed separate and distinct category of ‘x’ within the one speech he has got that brings ‘goods’ to the people. He can’t stop speaking or building his hopes on what is false and yet cannot stop seeing that the very thing he praises as a supposed path to ‘liberty’ again and again is oppression. He sees not that the Truth that he has no free will, that free will has never existed, but merely the lie that he or ‘they’ (of the present or past or future) have merely wrongly ‘used it’ and need ‘new directions’ to ‘use it properly’ (and properly defined exclusively to be ‘that which brings an unbroken string of emotional positives to the table perpetually). He always sees evil in the past (but exclusively defined as mere emotional negatives for his own heart were he in the same situation as those of whom he reads as having suffered those negatives in the past..) and yet repeats the same lies that brought that very evil as if not-lies that will lead to Utopia.

And he is considered a Conservative and Voice of Reason among those who love temporal ‘liberty’ , (such as those at the Brussel’s Journal) merely because he is perfectly interpreted as hearing him have the best intentions for his neighbor within the parameters of his best honesty –which is a lie.

Trying to do well is not doing well. Living in an environment in which each tells his neighbor “We’re human beings. That means we have free will! I’m for you and you’re for me and all of us together..! will do whatever we want..!” is not the same as living without sin.

Without new birth in Jesus Christ, they are all blind to the enemy that slays them while the enemy that slays them speaks through them as if a ‘non-interfering’ medium they know as language as a supposed ‘tool’ they ‘use’ to find truth and their way out of evil. Each tells his neighbor as anti-Christ speaks through them: “We need a better plan.”

God has already destroyed the very ‘wisdom’ they count on to climb their way out of evil: anti-Christ. The rest is just working it out.

—————————————————

1 Corinthians 1:19 For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and set aside the understanding of the understanding ones.

————————————————–

They are very good at not understanding and being confused.

Ezeliel 20:46-49 Son of man, set thy face toward the south, and drop words against the south, and prophesy against the forest of the south field; and say to the forest of the south, Hear the word of Jehovah. Thus saith the Lord Jehovah: Behold, I will kindle a fire in thee, and it shall devour every green tree in thee, and every dry tree: the flashing flame shall not be quenched; and all that it meets from the south to the north shall be burned thereby. And all flesh shall see that I Jehovah have kindled it: it shall not be quenched. And I said, Ah, Lord Jehovah! they say of me, Doth he not speak parables?

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

God Says and is Speaking:

Proverbs 30:15 The leech hath two daughters: Give, give.

Anti-Christ through Mr. Will has his own Twins he speaks in the name and cause of supposed Truth.
They are named:

The people.

and

“Your in the wrong department and you can’t get to the right one from here.”

In a loosely strung together set of lies that holds forth the only Good the good of Business and unrestrained divorce and gambling as an example of a good marketplace “model” (no doubt his false version of ‘capitalism’) , anti-Christ through George Will praises and equates anti-Christ’s seduction of Americans to immorality/sin through Nevada’s ease-of-divorce laws to further seduce Americans into a pit of gambling as a good example (’monument’ was the word) to be emulated in supposed ‘free’ will that is simply “entrepreneurial federalism” as practiced by states.

Mr. Will then has the appearance of proceeding to some other place in reality than sin merely because he is in a flow of words as a trip, after having hopefully hooked the reader’s mind and heart to his own chariot. He ends the mad dash to wickedness with an humble period …and obeisance to the emotional economy of anti-Christ as motto for the gulag of ‘free’ willism and flattery to the fallen human heart:

Entrepreneurial federalism puts useful pressure on states and localities to heed this axiom: Capital goes where it is welcome and stays where it is well treated.

America, indeed the whole world is a spiritual gulag in which the guards have the same speech (anti-Christ/non-creating speech of sin) as the prisoners, the whole system ‘works’ ( in that both are deceived that such things as guards and prisoners are delimited by ..something) because all are deceived the will is ‘free’ and all speech in total reality “non-interfering with the will” while the guards torment the prisoners with the saying “Made some bad choices did you? You’ll do better next time. See what happens when you make bad choices?” When one is freed from their lie of ‘choice’ and ‘free’ will as being genuinely born again in Jesus Christ and is new creation with God as Word and totally rejects anti-Christ as speech and in total, the warden puts in an appearence with the implied threat of “Have you seen your pastor/priest about what you’re saying?” and tries to desperately prove that only non-creating speech exists in total reality as the very fabric of the supposed only system and only reality.

According to anti-Christ through Mr. Will, ‘the states’ (as supposed entities separate from the people who are them, as if land or geography or even ‘ideas’ were ‘the government’ instead of the people and as such were to be treated differently than the individuals who comprise them under/as regards
“constitutional law”) should be given free reign to seduce the soul into every evil, (shrugging their shoulders the whole while and saying “Hey, nobody held a gun to their head. We’ve got free will.” ) and that seduction at the expense of whatever it is at the expense of, (or as anti-Christ says through Mr. Will: But much of their complaint is that entrepreneurial federalism sometimes does not make economic sense—it costs too much per job created. To which the wise response is: Well, yes, but so what?
) in addition to the soul, should be held up not as wickedness but as supposed ‘evidence’ and ‘proof’ that ‘capitalism'’/”entrepreneurial federalism” is the ‘ideal model of behavior’ for that ‘free’ will as governance.

Mr. Will holds forth implicitly that the premise of his writing (ever) is to ‘appeal to the free willed mind with logic’, then throws out any appeal to logic against his lies with what to him is the witticism of “yes, but so what?” …as if wisdom. He cannot even heed his own lies/advice on ‘capital’ he is paid to write to others; as regards the ‘logic’ in the only speech he has got he demonstrates he doesn’t even understand its own axioms: “Logic goes where it is welcome and stays where it is well treated.” Mr. Will no doubt considers himself to be a guard and his Logic the superior of that of the people. Mr. Will is deceived his speech is welcomed and well treated no matter what he says or how wicked it may be. The Truth is that Mr. Will has no control over his speech and goes where he cannot stop it and stays as tyranny as long as it can irrespective of the emotional set of its hearers. Thus it is no surprise he desires ‘capital’, as one word/spirit in his vocabulary to be as the rest of his speech and hopes for such devices/widgets as “entrepreneurial federalism” to help it be so. Such is the way of the non-creating speech in the supposed ‘free’ will: it always has a premise that it is necessary to be spoken to solve some emergency/’current situation’ as delivering the ‘right info at the right time’ and stays to speak on because it can’t stop but must pretend a new emergency that only it can solve is about to be reveiled –by it.

excerpted from: Will: Let States Be Entrepreneurs - Newsweek Columnists - MSNBC.com

Ohio, like almost all states, is practicing “entrepreneurial federalism.” One state—Nevada—is a monument to that. In 1903, with the Comstock Lode’s silver exhausted, Nevada, with a dwindling population and desperate for commerce, passed a law exempting corporations from taxes and most supervision of business practices. Other states blunted Nevada’s appeal by moving in the same direction, so Nevada found a new niche for uniqueness—divorce law.

Federalism had always encouraged “migratory” divorces as people sought the least demanding jurisdictions. For a while, Indiana and Illinois set the pace, then the Dakotas. But Nevada lawyers advertised in Eastern newspapers that their state had the nation’s shortest residency requirement and most numerous and easily proved grounds for divorce—and no impediment to immediate remarriage. In 1931, when there were rumors that Idaho and Arkansas might match Nevada’s three-month residency requirement, Nevada reduced it to six weeks. And, spotting another business opportunity in the federal system, Nevada legalized gambling, in part so that the mostly affluent people who traveled to the state for a divorce could entertain themselves while there.

Regarding Ohio’s successful courtship of DaimlerChrysler, the grievances of Ohio’s and Michigan’s taxpayers, valid or not, are political grievances for which there are political remedies—elections, which can change policymakers. The taxpayers have, in the modern manner, cast their complaint as a constitutional controversy. But much of their complaint is that entrepreneurial federalism sometimes does not make economic sense—it costs too much per job created. To which the wise response is: Well, yes, but so what?

Regarding Ohio’s successful courtship of DaimlerChrysler, the grievances of Ohio’s and Michigan’s taxpayers, valid or not, are political grievances for which there are political remedies—elections, which can change policymakers. The taxpayers have, in the modern manner, cast their complaint as a constitutional controversy. But much of their complaint is that entrepreneurial federalism sometimes does not make economic sense—it costs too much per job created. To which the wise response is: Well, yes, but so what?

If “foolish” or “inefficient” were synonyms for “unconstitutional,” the court would strike down much of the government. Of course entrepreneurial federalism sometimes fails to achieve cost-effective results—it is a government program. But entrepreneurial federalism can work very well indeed: Officials in Alabama, which used $253 million in incentives to defeat South Carolina in a competition to win a Mercedes-Benz plant, claim the cost was recovered in five years, and the deal led to landing four other auto plants.

To the extent that constitutional limits are placed on states’ abilities to compete to produce business-friendly policies, to that extent state politicians will feel free to impose burdens on businesses that are captives without alternatives. Entrepreneurial federalism puts useful pressure on states and localities to heed this axiom: Capital goes where it is welcome and stays where it is well treated.

Yeah, those people ‘capitalism’ enriched, using ‘federalism’ as a conduit on their way toward the easiest wicked spring to have their fill of water.

‘Federalism’ is not the implicit tool of evil and is not opposed to ‘capital’, irrespective of Mr. Will’s championing of it as a supposed road to immorality. One easily gets the impression Mr. Will actually hates the very capitalism and federalism he supposedly champions and sets them up as a supposed opposing force to ‘the people’ in order that the people, deceived they have free will, get the impression that their ‘ideas’ of governance are not so good after all and so need ‘a different system’ that they should ‘choose’ with the ‘free’ will. This in spite of the very term he speaks as “entrepreneurial federalism”" in a bid to seem to marry the two as friends of Business and Corporations against the people as if Business and Corporations were not the people.

And all this Mr. Will presents as ‘conservatism’.

Anti-Christ is always saying that you’ve applied to the wrong department in the Big Bureaucracy; that you may have a valid point (he would never be so impolitik as to say you were stoopid and have no point at all) but that your issue is a point to be taken up anywhere but Here and any other time than Now. Through Mr. Will, he says that ‘the people’, (as implicitly not-the-state and not-Business, not-federalism and not-captial) have ‘political’ means and ways to settle their grievances (as supposedly opposed to wasting the ‘courts time’ as if the court were not-the-people or political as well). Seems the people must be all out of ‘federalism’ to help them out as they try to penetrate the borders of Justice and get some against all those things supposedly not-them. It seems to Mr. Will that there is such a thing called Capital and that it does real things, such as lead those who follow it to Prosperity, but it and Prosperity are not-the-people either and that the erstwhile ‘federalism’ is only a conduit to wickedness and oppression.

In Mr. Will’s playstation, the people have free will and are in charge of something (the ‘idea’ of the Republic!) that unfortunately for them can’t be controlled by them (because they are always in the wrong department except when they obtain wickedness and can ‘use federalism’–they just keep making those ‘bad choices’ based on the ‘bad info’ they got) ; because they and ‘their ideas’ have free will and ‘their ideas’ and ‘abstracts’ have stronger wills than they. In the middle of all his bull***t, anti-Chirst through Mr. Will implies the will of each has it’s own place in which it is powerful; but the people’s ‘free’ will is never powerful Here, and never powerful Now. BUT –they definitely have it. “Everybody” knows that.

And all these ‘things’ on which Mr. Will writes? Stuff. Important. Info. Names. Particulars. Results of ‘free’ will piled up by countless generations. Unstoppable forces. Flow of history. Look out. Research. So what?

——————————————

Deu 18:21,22 And if thou say in thy heart, How shall we know the word that Jehovah hath not spoken? When a prophet speaketh in the name of Jehovah, and the thing followeth not, nor cometh to pass, that is the word which Jehovah hath not spoken; the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: be not afraid of him.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen