Christian Clarity Review

March 11, 2006

Anti-Christ wants the emotional marketplace of the Fallen human heart forcefully impressed as if wise governance

God Says and is Speaking:

Proverbs 30:15 The leech hath two daughters: Give, give.

Anti-Christ through Mr. Will has his own Twins he speaks in the name and cause of supposed Truth.
They are named:

The people.

and

“Your in the wrong department and you can’t get to the right one from here.”

In a loosely strung together set of lies that holds forth the only Good the good of Business and unrestrained divorce and gambling as an example of a good marketplace “model” (no doubt his false version of ‘capitalism’) , anti-Christ through George Will praises and equates anti-Christ’s seduction of Americans to immorality/sin through Nevada’s ease-of-divorce laws to further seduce Americans into a pit of gambling as a good example (’monument’ was the word) to be emulated in supposed ‘free’ will that is simply “entrepreneurial federalism” as practiced by states.

Mr. Will then has the appearance of proceeding to some other place in reality than sin merely because he is in a flow of words as a trip, after having hopefully hooked the reader’s mind and heart to his own chariot. He ends the mad dash to wickedness with an humble period …and obeisance to the emotional economy of anti-Christ as motto for the gulag of ‘free’ willism and flattery to the fallen human heart:

Entrepreneurial federalism puts useful pressure on states and localities to heed this axiom: Capital goes where it is welcome and stays where it is well treated.

America, indeed the whole world is a spiritual gulag in which the guards have the same speech (anti-Christ/non-creating speech of sin) as the prisoners, the whole system ‘works’ ( in that both are deceived that such things as guards and prisoners are delimited by ..something) because all are deceived the will is ‘free’ and all speech in total reality “non-interfering with the will” while the guards torment the prisoners with the saying “Made some bad choices did you? You’ll do better next time. See what happens when you make bad choices?” When one is freed from their lie of ‘choice’ and ‘free’ will as being genuinely born again in Jesus Christ and is new creation with God as Word and totally rejects anti-Christ as speech and in total, the warden puts in an appearence with the implied threat of “Have you seen your pastor/priest about what you’re saying?” and tries to desperately prove that only non-creating speech exists in total reality as the very fabric of the supposed only system and only reality.

According to anti-Christ through Mr. Will, ‘the states’ (as supposed entities separate from the people who are them, as if land or geography or even ‘ideas’ were ‘the government’ instead of the people and as such were to be treated differently than the individuals who comprise them under/as regards
“constitutional law”) should be given free reign to seduce the soul into every evil, (shrugging their shoulders the whole while and saying “Hey, nobody held a gun to their head. We’ve got free will.” ) and that seduction at the expense of whatever it is at the expense of, (or as anti-Christ says through Mr. Will: But much of their complaint is that entrepreneurial federalism sometimes does not make economic sense—it costs too much per job created. To which the wise response is: Well, yes, but so what?
) in addition to the soul, should be held up not as wickedness but as supposed ‘evidence’ and ‘proof’ that ‘capitalism'’/”entrepreneurial federalism” is the ‘ideal model of behavior’ for that ‘free’ will as governance.

Mr. Will holds forth implicitly that the premise of his writing (ever) is to ‘appeal to the free willed mind with logic’, then throws out any appeal to logic against his lies with what to him is the witticism of “yes, but so what?” …as if wisdom. He cannot even heed his own lies/advice on ‘capital’ he is paid to write to others; as regards the ‘logic’ in the only speech he has got he demonstrates he doesn’t even understand its own axioms: “Logic goes where it is welcome and stays where it is well treated.” Mr. Will no doubt considers himself to be a guard and his Logic the superior of that of the people. Mr. Will is deceived his speech is welcomed and well treated no matter what he says or how wicked it may be. The Truth is that Mr. Will has no control over his speech and goes where he cannot stop it and stays as tyranny as long as it can irrespective of the emotional set of its hearers. Thus it is no surprise he desires ‘capital’, as one word/spirit in his vocabulary to be as the rest of his speech and hopes for such devices/widgets as “entrepreneurial federalism” to help it be so. Such is the way of the non-creating speech in the supposed ‘free’ will: it always has a premise that it is necessary to be spoken to solve some emergency/’current situation’ as delivering the ‘right info at the right time’ and stays to speak on because it can’t stop but must pretend a new emergency that only it can solve is about to be reveiled –by it.

excerpted from: Will: Let States Be Entrepreneurs - Newsweek Columnists - MSNBC.com

Ohio, like almost all states, is practicing “entrepreneurial federalism.” One state—Nevada—is a monument to that. In 1903, with the Comstock Lode’s silver exhausted, Nevada, with a dwindling population and desperate for commerce, passed a law exempting corporations from taxes and most supervision of business practices. Other states blunted Nevada’s appeal by moving in the same direction, so Nevada found a new niche for uniqueness—divorce law.

Federalism had always encouraged “migratory” divorces as people sought the least demanding jurisdictions. For a while, Indiana and Illinois set the pace, then the Dakotas. But Nevada lawyers advertised in Eastern newspapers that their state had the nation’s shortest residency requirement and most numerous and easily proved grounds for divorce—and no impediment to immediate remarriage. In 1931, when there were rumors that Idaho and Arkansas might match Nevada’s three-month residency requirement, Nevada reduced it to six weeks. And, spotting another business opportunity in the federal system, Nevada legalized gambling, in part so that the mostly affluent people who traveled to the state for a divorce could entertain themselves while there.

Regarding Ohio’s successful courtship of DaimlerChrysler, the grievances of Ohio’s and Michigan’s taxpayers, valid or not, are political grievances for which there are political remedies—elections, which can change policymakers. The taxpayers have, in the modern manner, cast their complaint as a constitutional controversy. But much of their complaint is that entrepreneurial federalism sometimes does not make economic sense—it costs too much per job created. To which the wise response is: Well, yes, but so what?

Regarding Ohio’s successful courtship of DaimlerChrysler, the grievances of Ohio’s and Michigan’s taxpayers, valid or not, are political grievances for which there are political remedies—elections, which can change policymakers. The taxpayers have, in the modern manner, cast their complaint as a constitutional controversy. But much of their complaint is that entrepreneurial federalism sometimes does not make economic sense—it costs too much per job created. To which the wise response is: Well, yes, but so what?

If “foolish” or “inefficient” were synonyms for “unconstitutional,” the court would strike down much of the government. Of course entrepreneurial federalism sometimes fails to achieve cost-effective results—it is a government program. But entrepreneurial federalism can work very well indeed: Officials in Alabama, which used $253 million in incentives to defeat South Carolina in a competition to win a Mercedes-Benz plant, claim the cost was recovered in five years, and the deal led to landing four other auto plants.

To the extent that constitutional limits are placed on states’ abilities to compete to produce business-friendly policies, to that extent state politicians will feel free to impose burdens on businesses that are captives without alternatives. Entrepreneurial federalism puts useful pressure on states and localities to heed this axiom: Capital goes where it is welcome and stays where it is well treated.

Yeah, those people ‘capitalism’ enriched, using ‘federalism’ as a conduit on their way toward the easiest wicked spring to have their fill of water.

‘Federalism’ is not the implicit tool of evil and is not opposed to ‘capital’, irrespective of Mr. Will’s championing of it as a supposed road to immorality. One easily gets the impression Mr. Will actually hates the very capitalism and federalism he supposedly champions and sets them up as a supposed opposing force to ‘the people’ in order that the people, deceived they have free will, get the impression that their ‘ideas’ of governance are not so good after all and so need ‘a different system’ that they should ‘choose’ with the ‘free’ will. This in spite of the very term he speaks as “entrepreneurial federalism”" in a bid to seem to marry the two as friends of Business and Corporations against the people as if Business and Corporations were not the people.

And all this Mr. Will presents as ‘conservatism’.

Anti-Christ is always saying that you’ve applied to the wrong department in the Big Bureaucracy; that you may have a valid point (he would never be so impolitik as to say you were stoopid and have no point at all) but that your issue is a point to be taken up anywhere but Here and any other time than Now. Through Mr. Will, he says that ‘the people’, (as implicitly not-the-state and not-Business, not-federalism and not-captial) have ‘political’ means and ways to settle their grievances (as supposedly opposed to wasting the ‘courts time’ as if the court were not-the-people or political as well). Seems the people must be all out of ‘federalism’ to help them out as they try to penetrate the borders of Justice and get some against all those things supposedly not-them. It seems to Mr. Will that there is such a thing called Capital and that it does real things, such as lead those who follow it to Prosperity, but it and Prosperity are not-the-people either and that the erstwhile ‘federalism’ is only a conduit to wickedness and oppression.

In Mr. Will’s playstation, the people have free will and are in charge of something (the ‘idea’ of the Republic!) that unfortunately for them can’t be controlled by them (because they are always in the wrong department except when they obtain wickedness and can ‘use federalism’–they just keep making those ‘bad choices’ based on the ‘bad info’ they got) ; because they and ‘their ideas’ have free will and ‘their ideas’ and ‘abstracts’ have stronger wills than they. In the middle of all his bull***t, anti-Chirst through Mr. Will implies the will of each has it’s own place in which it is powerful; but the people’s ‘free’ will is never powerful Here, and never powerful Now. BUT –they definitely have it. “Everybody” knows that.

And all these ‘things’ on which Mr. Will writes? Stuff. Important. Info. Names. Particulars. Results of ‘free’ will piled up by countless generations. Unstoppable forces. Flow of history. Look out. Research. So what?

——————————————

Deu 18:21,22 And if thou say in thy heart, How shall we know the word that Jehovah hath not spoken? When a prophet speaketh in the name of Jehovah, and the thing followeth not, nor cometh to pass, that is the word which Jehovah hath not spoken; the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: be not afraid of him.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://christianclarityreview.wpblogs.com/2006/03/11/anti-christ-wants-the-emotional-marketplace-of-the-fallen-human-heart-forcefully-impressed-as-if-wise-governance/trackback/

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>