Christian Clarity Review

Once again, anti-Christ seeks to do his version of his”nice” toward God’s people while accusing us of not not doing his version of nice back toward him as if a genuine sin has been commited because of the lack of doing his supposed sacred etiquette and not being an emotional supplier and consumer in his emotional marketplace. Anti-Christ seeks to describe what he does not know as God plainly declares the natural man cannot know the things of God nor is the spiriutal man discerned of any.

1Corinthians 2:14,15 But the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him; and he cannot know them because they are spiritually discerned; but the spiritual discerns all things, and *he* is discerned of no one.

Yet once again anti-Christ seeks to grapple with what to him is a conundrum of “How to flatter “Fundamentalists” and yet preserve “Romanness”". He does this in his own mind by making a straw man of what he does not understand expressly to pretend to have the ‘free’ will and an intellectual arsenal “within free will” to overcome the conundrum and to supposedly demonstrate the public use of that supposed arsenal by the mere saying of his words.

(The word agree in the form of ‘diagree’, ‘agreement’ or “agree” appears fifteen times in this one article. The word “view” eight times. The words are always to be found in anti-Christ’s mouth as an implicit demonstration of supposed ‘free’ will in and as supposed will-neutral speech and as the de facto speech of what anti-Christ calls through the Romanists “Mother Church”.)

———————————-

excerpted from:Fundamentalists

Since the source for every fundamentalist’s faith is the Bible, we begin there. Fundamentalists will always settle an argument by appealing to the Scriptures. But what do they believe about the Bible? We can’t understand them unless we first understand their deep devotion to Scripture as their absolute.

We all need a final, unimpeachable “court of last resort” beyond which no appeal can go. Most of the modem world is a spiritual shambles because it has no absolute. More, we need a concrete and not just an abstract absolute. A mere ideal, like “the good, the true and the beautiful” or “the idea of God,” won’t do. If God is to be our absolute, He must touch us where we are.

Fundamentalists and Catholics agree that this point of contact is Christ. We also agree that the Bible is a divinely inspired, infallible and authoritative means for us to know Christ. But we disagree about other means, especially the Church and its relation to the Bible. Fundamentalists take Scripture out of the context of the historical Church that wrote it, canonized it, preserved it and now teaches and interprets it. To Catholics, that’s like taking a baby out of the context of its mother.

It is a fault, of course, to ignore Mother Church. But it is a virtue to love Baby Bible, a virtue we should respect and imitate. We can love other things too little, but we can’t love the Bible too much. We can love it wrongly. But we are not wrong to love it.

—————————————————–

It is of couse not possible to have a “court of last resort” when all that supposedly exists are “views” and “agreements” between men. The desire to have such a court plainly demonstrates that the Romanists do not consider God’s Word any, much less The final authority at all, but look to only a commitee of non-regenerate, constantly under-’informed’ natural men as arbitors of an ever changing “theology” as overlords / interpertors of God’s supposed “will neutral meanings” whose leaven only seems to change as the ‘holy info’ “becomes known”.

“The source of every Fundamentalists faith is the Bible.” (according to anti-Christ, our faith is not God Himself in us as He non-metaphorically lives in us because we are real, literal new creatures in Jesus Christ, but our faith is supposedly mere words written on paper that supposed weirdly attracts us and to which we (according to anti-Christ) falsely ascribe divine ‘powers’..) Then: “Mother Church”, “Baby Bible”. That sums the Romanists right there. How plainly the Romanists loaths the throught of God actually and non-metaphorically in us and God being His Word.

And the Romanists are not kidding. Like Mormons or Eastern Orthodox, Moonies and Islamicists, they are simply going to bluff it out to the end with a smile, Mom , Pop and Tradition and the peculiarities of their own emotional etiquette, “Hail Mary” and “Mother Church” on their breath. A Mormon actually thinks his or her bluff and deception of “Heavenly Father” is a worthy substitute for Jesus Christ and actual new birth in Jesus Christ. In their own mind, it is simply their own version, a personalization of what “we” are doing. So with an Islamic or a Hindu, a Taoists or a more obvious witch or sorcerer. Romanists think that they will do the ceremony “with more feeling this time” …and then those Fundamentalists (Romanists never call real, literal new creatures in Jesus Christ real literal new creatures in Jesus Christ but only call ‘them’ some new title indicative of both derision and separation from Romanists. It used to “Calvinists”. Now its “Fundamentalists” or “Evangelicals”. They ought really to just go ahead and calls us “emotional negatives”; as in “Those Emotional Negatives don’t admit pergatory even exists! How can we control whole families without the threat of their ancestor’s or children’s soul at the mercy of Mother Church?!” ) will ‘agree’ that free willers have something, anything at all, in common with real, literal new creatures in Jesus Christ. Romanists will simply be ’soft handed’ on the one hand ( For Mark Foley, (without at all excusing Mark Foley or the Republicans for knowing full and well who and what he was..) they apparently went so soft as to have nude hot tub sessions) and then ‘excommunicate’ some on the other as if anything they do has anything at all to do with the real Jesus Christ or actual new birth in Jesus Christ and as if their non-creating speech were an actual delimiter of any boundary of what one is first “in” or “out” of.

Whenever the rherotic of “view”, “opinion” and “let’s just accentuate the things on which we can agree” begins, anti-Christ is speaking and seeking to directly compare his own heart and speech with God as Word and the total Trinity, which is of course, the unforgiveable sin against the Holy Spirit. At the end of day, all Romanists perpetually do is be used of anti-Christ to accuse the rest of the world of “making up their own Church” when in truth it is expressly the Romanists who has done that since before the apostles were even out of the flesh, just as Cain did Abel pre-arguement and Korah did before he died.

3John 1:9-14 I wrote something to the assembly; but Diotrephes, who loves to have the first place among them, receives us not. For this reason, if I come, I will bring to remembrance his works which he does, babbling against us with wicked words; and not content with these, neither does he himself receive the brethren; and those who would he prevents, and casts them out of the assembly. Beloved, do not imitate what is evil, but what is good. He that does good is of God. He that does evil has not seen God. Demetrius has witness borne to him by all, and by the truth itself; and *we* also bear witness, and thou knowest that our witness is true. I had many things to write to thee, but I will not with ink and pen write to thee; but I hope soon to see thee, and we will speak mouth to mouth. Peace be to thee. The friends greet thee. Greet the friends by name.

Jude 1:10-13 But these, whatever things they know not, they speak railingly against; but what even, as the irrational animals, they understand by mere nature, in these things they corrupt themselves. Woe to them! because they have gone in the way of Cain, and given themselves up to the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core. These are spots in your love-feasts, feasting together with you without fear, pasturing themselves; clouds without water, carried along by the winds; autumnal trees, without fruit, twice dead, rooted up; raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shames; wandering stars, to whom has been reserved the gloom of darkness for eternity.

God very plainly Says as spirit and life that the words of the Scripture are to be believed as being sent from Him and as Him:

John 5:46,47 for if ye had believed Moses, ye would have believed me, for he wrote of me. But if ye do not believe his writings, how shall ye believe my words?

God no where Says that an organization called the ‘Church’ supercedes Him as Word. Indeed, quite the alien:

Luke 21:33 The heaven and the earth shall pass away, but my words shall in no wise pass away.

1 Corinthians 3:11 For other foundation can no man lay besides that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ.

Act 4:10-12 be it known to you all, and to all the people of Israel, that in the name of Jesus Christ the Nazaraean, whom *ye* have crucified, whom God has raised from among the dead, by *him* this man stands here before you sound in body . *He* is the stone which has been set at nought by you the builders, which is become the corner stone. And salvation is in none other, for neither is there another name under heaven which is given among men by which we must be saved.

Plainly anti-Christ through the Roman Catholic Church seeks to lie to men that “Mother Church”, which can easily trace its ancestry back to idol worship says who will go to heaven and who will not when God plainly declared to Peter that the rock on which the true Church was founded was not Peter, but the reality that ONLY God can reveal Truth/divinity to His people:

Matthew 16:13-18 But when Jesus was come into the parts of Caesarea-Philippi, he demanded of his disciples, saying, Who do men say that I the Son of man am? And they said, Some, John the baptist; and others, Elias; and others again, Jeremias or one of the prophets. He says to them, But *ye*, who do ye say that I am? And Simon Peter answering said, *Thou* art the Christ, the Son of the living God. And Jesus answering said to him, Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona, for flesh and blood has not revealed it to thee, but my Father who is in the heavens. And *I* also, I say unto thee that *thou* art Peter, and on this rock I will build my assembly, and hades’ gates shall not prevail against it.

God never says to Peter “..and on you I will build the Church” as anti-Christ seeks to constantly declare through the Romanists. It is strictly on the Truth in God that only God can give divine and perfect/holy Life and understanding as Himself as Love that the Church/Body of Christ is built, blessed and perfected by God in Jesus Christ by the power of the Holy Spirit.

John 6:63 It is the Spirit which quickens, the flesh profits nothing: the words which I have spoken unto you are spirit and are life.

God also plainly never says “No matter what else you do, always go to Church somewhere.” In Truth God Says:

Proverbs 19:27 Cease, my son, to hear the instruction which causeth to stray from the words of knowledge.

Proverbs 14:7 Go from the presence of a foolish man, in whom thou perceivest not the lips of knowledge.

Luke 8:18 Take heed therefore how ye hear; for whosoever has, to him shall be given, and whosoever has not, even what he seems to have shall be taken from him.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen