Christian Clarity Review

Hm. The recent APIS e-newsletter I take on beekeeping revealed an Italian article in which bees were reported to be avoiding fields planted with genetically modifiied organisms (GMOs) . There was a link, but it only went to the source (Agenzia Giornalistica) , not the article. A search as per the box on the page indicated an article identical to what Google News had: Bees shun Biotech: Coldiretti: Nature Defends Itself, the caption of which is :

(AGI) - Rome, Jan 3 - The fact that bees are staying away from fields cultivated with genetically modified organisms and the consequent reduction in …

But the link lead only back to the main page.

Bees not interesting in the pollen of GMOs? Not interested in cross-contaminating, er, cross-pollinating GMOs with normal food/ non-GMOs?

If not, then .. What’s that? The end of being certain “organic” is really “organic” and Non-Messed With is really Non-Messed With because you can’t keep up with the bees if they DO cross-pollinate GMOs with non-GMOs?

Genesis 41:17,18 And Pharaoh said to Joseph, In my dream, behold, I stood on the bank of the river. And behold, there came up out of the river seven kine, fat-fleshed and of fine form, and they fed in the reed-grass.

..and I wanted to wake up and bee happy, proclaim a celebration of my own wisdom, agricultural acumen and enterprise. But lo, I dreamed on and dang it all..

Genesis 41:19-21 And behold, seven other kine came up after them, poor, and very ill-formed, and lean-fleshed–such as I never saw in all the land of Egypt for badness. And the lean and bad kine ate up the seven first fat kine; and they came into their belly, and it could not be known that they had come into their belly; and their look was bad, as at the beginning. And I awoke.

In the mind of Big Agriculture, which is being lead by anti-Christ toward a dream of supposed plenty as if there were not already enough to eat and good food besides, it is probably best just not to talk about GMOs and bees at all. If they say the bees don’t avoid GMOs then there is of course cross-pollination with non-GMOs. If they say the bees are avoiding GMOs, then what does that say about the GMOs?

Even female wild rats will not copulate with sterilzed male rats. Sending sterilized male rats back into the sewers didn’t work.

They know.

———————

Luke 20:1-8 And it came to pass on one of the days, as he was teaching the people in the temple, and announcing the glad tidings, the chief priests and the scribes with the elders came up, and spoke to him saying, Tell us by what authority thou doest these things, or who is it who has given thee this authority? And he answering said to them, *I* also will ask you one thing, and tell me: The baptism of John, was it of heaven or of men? And they reasoned among themselves, saying, If we should say, Of heaven, he will say, Why have ye not believed him? but if we should say, Of men, the whole people will stone us, for they are persuaded that John was a prophet. And they answered, they did not know whence. And Jesus said to them, Neither do *I* tell you by what authority I do these things.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

excerpted from: WorldNetDaily: Rick Warren: Is he or isn’t he?

Among several interesting revelations of that dialogue was Warren’s admission – a boast, really – that he is a member in good standing of the Council on Foreign Relations, an organization specifically founded to attack national sovereignty, to promote world government and to enlist U.S. church leaders in those goals.

It was in the context of our debate over Warren’s characterization of Syria as a “moderate” country that provides religious freedom to Christians that I suggested the media’s favorite mega-pastor should have sought counsel from someone like me – a Christian journalist of Syrian and Lebanese heritage who has covered and analyzed the Middle East for the last 25 years.

Warren explained, somewhat condescendingly, that he had counseled with the National Security Council and the White House, as well as the State Department, before his little pilgrimage to Damascus.

‘’In fact,'’ Warren added, ‘’as a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and Oxford Analytica, I might know as much about the Middle East as you.'’

————————

The Council on Foriegn Relations is indeed an organization of anti-Christ, along with the American Enterprise Institute and others of their kind that seek pluralization of …everything as they war against Jesus Christ under the guise of championing “traditional values” they have generalized across literally all false religion as “pragmatic, political nuances” and have fucntionally usurped U.S. diplomacy therein.

excerpted from the article “God’s Country?” in Foreign Affairs, a CFR publication in which the article casts “Evangelicals” (such as Rick Warren) as a supposed “middle path” and political centrists directly because they are supposedly theological centrists and essentially saying there is hope for “working with Christians” in the direct admission that the Council on Foreign Relations is not of Christ at all, dispite it’s pretense of having its own clergy in the guise of representing many demoninations:

Their own summary of the article:

Summary: Religion has always been a major force in U.S. politics, but the recent surge in the number and the power of evangelicals is recasting the country’s political scene — with dramatic implications for foreign policy. This should not be cause for panic: evangelicals are passionately devoted to justice and improving the world, and eager to reach out across sectarian lines.

Evangelicals, the third of the leading strands in American Protestantism, straddle the divide between fundamentalists and liberals. Their core beliefs share common roots with fundamentalism, but their ideas about the world have been heavily influenced by the optimism endemic to U.S. society. Although there is considerable theological diversity within this group, in general it is informed by the “soft Calvinism” of the sixteenth-century Dutch theologian Jacobus Arminius, the thinking of English evangelists such as John Wesley (who carried on the tradition of German Pietism), and, in the United States, the experience of the eighteenth-century Great Awakening and subsequent religious revivals.

…

Evangelicals can be hard to predict. Shocked by recent polls showing that a substantial majority of Americans reject the theory of evolution, intellectuals and journalists in the United States and abroad have braced themselves for an all-out assault on Darwinian science. But no such onslaught has been forthcoming. U.S. public opinion has long rejected Darwinism, yet even in states such as Alabama, Mississippi, and South Carolina, which have large actively Christian populations, state universities go on teaching astronomy, genetics, geology, and paleontology with no concern for religious cosmology, and the United States continues to support the world’s most successful scientific community.

…

In these cases as in others, evangelical political power today is not leading the United States in a completely new direction.

…

Liberals, whether religious or not, may want to oppose the evangelical agenda in domestic politics. For the most part, however, these quarrels can cease at the water’s edge. As the rising evangelical establishment gains experience in foreign policy, it is likely to prove a valuable — if not always easy — partner for the mostly secular or liberal Christian establishment. Some fears about the evangelical influence in foreign policy are simply overblown.

…

Similarly, engaging evangelicals in broader foreign policy discussions can lead to surprising and (for some) heartening developments. A group of leading conservative evangelicals recently signed a statement on climate change that stated that the problem is real, that human activity is an important contributing cause, that the costs of inaction will be high and disproportionately affect the poor, and that Christians have a moral duty to help deal with it. Meanwhile, evangelicals who began by opposing Sudanese violence and slave raids against Christians in southern Sudan have gone on to broaden the coalition working to protect Muslims in Darfur.

…

As more evangelical leaders acquire firsthand experience in foreign policy, they are likely to provide something now sadly lacking in the world of U.S. foreign policy: a trusted group of experts, well versed in the nuances and dilemmas of the international situation, who are able to persuade large numbers of Americans to support the complex and counterintuitive policies that are sometimes necessary in this wicked and frustrating — or, dare one say it, fallen — world.

—————————-

Plainly, anti-Christ as CFR sees true Christians as politically / diplomatically backward, unfortunately not yet politically disenfranchinsed or unarmed, and yet teachable within limits so long as they hold to the lie of ‘free will’ so that they may be so disenfranchised and unarmed in the future by teaching (what is plainly to CFR ..) “them” (as an enemy and opponent) ‘how’ to use the ‘free will’ properly as setting up CFR and other ‘think-tanks’ as functional priests over all via domestic and foreign policy. They admit plainly that they have the mind of anti-Christ and that true Christians are both a threat to their own lies as to the purpose of politics and diplomacy and what they fundamentally are by their open hatred of Jesus Christ as He actually Is. The whole hope of anti-Christ politically in the United States lies in crafting a false Christianity by any means and continually praising those who genuinely think his thoughts as a Pavlov’s dog waiting for a word of praise from the ‘priests’ rather than a biscuit in order to train those so deceived they are both “for” Jesus and the good ‘ol USA: something anti-Christ has done in the Soviet Union, China, all of Islam and elsewhere to this day only with their own brand name of anti-Christ to the obvious ruin of all caught in that lie.

Plainly, CFR, the tool of anti-Christ, whose best honesty is the lie that men have free will and there are endless “nuances” in that supposed freedom of will and emotional swamp such that they must be functional “priest” to guide “pastors” through “it” prefer not only to craft their own “theological and therefore political centrists” to present to the American people as a supposed ideal mixtures of ‘governance’ and ‘faith’ but to import pastor’s to their lies who have a false gospel of “free will”/Arminianism (any who ‘offer Jesus’ as a supposed choice of the human will and who functionally claim only one speech exists in total reality and that that speech is will-neutral/non-creating speech which IS the spirit of real and non-metaphorical pre-falsely-incarnate anti-Christ) as a foundation on which to compound worse lies to control the people.

These are the same people who work night and day to undermine the sovereignty of the United States, ( which many hundreds of thousands of United States soldiers have died protecting ) and which seek day and night to instill the lie that national sovereignty is a thing given by men to other men rather than by God to those to whom He gives for His Own Purposes. It is little wonder that the butcher of North Korea, Kim Jong Il would ask for Warren by name as a ‘Christian’ he could work with; CFR and North Korea both have the same mind and the same speech with only minor competeing emotions over the same ‘issues’ within anti-Christ as oppsoing niche tumors in anti-Christ’s mind.

Every made-up and lying emergency that is spoken and re-spoken and embraced by the non-regenerate as simply more of the speech they already worship (anti-Christ as non-creating speech) and is there/exists to do nothing more than functionally re-define money to usurp the honest labor done by the simple as making them slaves through the use of the lie of free will and ‘holy directions’ to ‘heaven’: to functionally tell all except the “priest class” that they have the wrong kind of money ( as a medium of exchange of the ‘free will’ to buy happiness; the wrong kind of ..governance; the wrong kind of ideal model of behavior; the wrong kind of religion, the wrong kind of everything..) and so must start over ..at each speech and law declared by the “priests”.

———————————–

What of Oxford Analytica?

From a recent speech: The Peril of the Dominant Culture and the Idea of America

We must shift out of our “comfort zone” and realize that the flip side of globalization is the “politics of despair.” In other words, our standard of living and wealth is grounded on having the world not only as a market for our products and services, but also on having the world as a resource for cheap labor, energy and manufacturers in return.

What can we do to avoid the perils of the dominant culture and give the “idea of America” the best chance to endure?

First of all, we must recognize that no one has been here before – we’re in a new kind of global game – it is being played out in all spheres and in all dimensions. It’s going to be a generational battle for hearts and minds.

Second, we must begin by carefully listening to all that is being said around the world about how America is viewed today. This must then be critiqued and analyzed to draw conclusions as to accuracy, not only of the reporting, but also of the views reported. Even when such views are erroneous, we must recognize that perceptions are what count. Unfortunately, in this situation, truth is not as important as perception.

Third, we have to be open to change in our policies, attitudes and behavior, particularly where there is perceived unfairness or injustice that obscures our message.

——————————-

In the mind of anti-Christ, but in every way not seeing themselves as they truly are in the eyes of Christ, they seek as a kind of altruism to make of the United States something it never was or is on the pretext of ’saving it’ by a multitude of policies/laws-for-free-will-of-others. God Says plainly:

Ecc 3:15 That which is was long ago, and that which is to be hath already been; and God bringeth back again that which is past.

Yet the mind of anti-Christ seeks day in and out to hold forth that “we” “face new challenges” ( ..”a new global game”) never encountered by former ages such that we “must have” “new solutions” that the “old man” never needed and which of course, the Holy Scriptures as God’s Word or God’s Holy Spirit “couldn’t have anticipated” ( or more serruptiously “old and unenlightend interpetations of God’s Word” are to be thrown out in favor of a new ‘hermeneutic’/lens-on-Scripture so as to seem to honor Jesus Christ but so as to make of Him a mere tool for the avarice of the “priests”..) but that we must “embrace” in order to survive and to have that “quality of life” whose definition changes with the wind. “Why look there! Even a Pastor of a Mega-Church (you know –that place where a Lot of Smart people have Agreed with their free will that what he says is Truth else he wouldn’t be the pastor..?) is saying my use of gasoline is killing the polar bears! It must then be true! A “Christian” who a Lot of People Agree With and Give Money To ..said it! ”

In the mind of anti-Christ as well, everything but God must be feared: what is in the heart of another human ( especially a foreigner in relation to Business and Economy) being must be feared and given place to as defining ‘the principles’ of ‘free willed’ domestic governance. Things such as ‘views’ and ‘opinions’ actually exist in them there foreigners because sin and anti-Christ supposedly do not exist or are defined in such ways as to make them non-interfering with the human will so as to perpetuate the lie of ‘free will’ and thus the necessity for those every-changing “holy directions” those foreigners must necessarily have a Say, or at least the fascade of a Say, in dictating.

The lie of free will is always going on about “why” and “how”. It builds on the supposed truth and its own best honesty and best intentions that is a lie and wickedness that you have free will and thus are in need of directions on ‘how’ to ‘use it’. It builds on the lie in that lie as the speech that speaks it that only one speech exists in total reality, there is no new birth in Jesus Christ by Him as Word/Creating Speech and that the non-regenerate don’t exist as such but are just eternal “human beings” because there is nothing for the unconditionally elect to become: that there is no way Out and so even saying Out is nonsense as there is supposedly no fall, no sin, no anti-Christ, no evil from which to be saved; there is supposedly nothing then to be saved into except a better ideal model of behavior that makes the heart happy by proper use of the will and that salvation accomplished by admitting that everything you have done in the past is Wrong, that you are Guilty and that the Priests must redeem you into the New World Order or they simply won’t stop talking and that part of the Redemption is no country and total worship of the Preists as functional gods.

And they wonder out loud why the Mayans walked away from a ‘civilization’…

The Mayan leaders were just Rick Warren, Oxford Analytica, Council on Foreign Relations, the American Enterprise Institure and all such “think-tanks” and “Progressive Christian” organizations with ceremony, face paint and a headdress being openly honest about their agenda of human sacrifice as population control.

———————————

John 3:3 Jesus answered and said to him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except any one be born anew he cannot see the kingdom of God.

1Peter 1:23-25 being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the living and abiding word of God. Because all flesh is as grass, and all its glory as the flower of grass. The grass has withered and its flower has fallen; but the word of the Lord abides for eternity. But this is the word which in the glad tidings is preached to you.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen