Anti-Christ at the American Thinker” : MultiCulturalist Piety Mandates Christians be against “Pure Christianity”
Anti-Christ at the American Thinker has yet again spoken as if you had free will, only non-creating spoeech existed in total reality and the only thing that ought to be done with that ‘free’ will, seeing it is “free”, is for you as Christians, ANY and EVERY time you supposedly self-decide to “pick up arms” in defense of hearth and home is to defend those of “other faiths”.
What new creature in Jesus Christ? What Spirit of God in you doing as He pleases? Supposedly, you as a supposed permament non-new creature in Jesus Christ and as a free willed entity can ONLY, per the lie of free will through the “ethicist”/”theologian” at the American Thinker, pick up arms IF YOU INCLUDE “OTHER RELIGIONS” as part of what you are defending. Otherwise you have supposedly commited a religious faux pau of such magnitude as to offend ..somebody. The implication is of course that to offend murderous and God-hating pagans is to offend God.
No doubt the FreeMasons, Shriners, Islamics and other witches and their apologists are back-slapping each other and sending in comments like “great article!’ and “I was really glad for that informative and well researched article on the whys and wherefores of pacifism and just use of force, James, and have recommended it as required reading for all –or else! ”
——————————
American Thinker: Pacifism and the Sword: Fight or Flight?
So, under real-life extreme conditions like those in Africa, what is the best way to defend and protect the persecuted and to work towards not fusing the two realms together, in the long run? Here are ten practical guidelines that are based on the two bedrock principles. For clarity and emphasis I repeat key clauses throughout this section.
(1) In extreme circumstances and as a last resort, if Christians are forced to form armed organizations to defend themselves and to protect the needy (and organizing in this way is a dangerous prospect because so many things can go wrong), then they must still fight for the freedom of all peoples of all religions. They must be religiously neutral. In effect, they become secular in their public actions and goals, though they are Christians in their personal and private lives. Such organizations nobly and unselfishly seek to reestablish the State without themselves becoming extremists and taking over the neutral government and turning it into a religious state, of sorts. The ultimate goal is to reestablish religious freedom and to throw off religious oppression, as seen everywhere in Islamic countries (see points three, five, and ten in this addendum, below
——————————————
As always, Satan is ONLY interested in a generic “religious freedom” as a “generic priniciple” higher than God, not in the freedom to be absolutely honest before God in Jesus Christ. Indeed, according to Satan at the American Thinker, the very weapons that God has given us to fight against oppression are defined to be exclusively in the service of Satan against all certainty. Seems everyone, according to anti-Christ at the American Thinker, no matter their “private” thoughts and “beliefs” is required by something-other-than-Jesus-Christ to be pro-what-God-has-shown-us-to-be-the-Lie as a political maxium and dogma higher than God Himself.
————————–
The whole article is such a monstrous lie that spouts the agenda of “multi-everythingism” as to be so obviously occult one wonders why even the pretence that James Arlandson got “his conclusions” from “a study of the New Testement”. What real Christian is he talking to? All he does is condemn himself before God as a murderer of the brethren and body of Christ.
Not only does the great Liar at the American Thinker accuse that God is not in us doing as He pleases such that we supposedly need the sage “advice” of anti-Christs to know what to do with “free” will, but that we are simply selfish and proud to admit what God has plainly shown us as Himself as Truth AS GOD DOES IT THROUGH US and that the “humble” thing to do is to deny Christ by outright denying Christ Jesus and calling such denial the very definition of piety. (!)
The great Liar at the American Thinker proclaims that the greatest good of Christianity is to ..fight against Christianity by the means of shopping for such a lie as “other faiths” in order to protect “other faiths” against “pure Christianity” to impress God how serious we are –about Christianity. It is such a bizarre lie written with such confidence as to make very plain the article is the polished product of an ancient lie and one well used to being believed with no question and not at all simply a “first look” into the supposed “problem of pacifism versus physical survival in Christ Jesus”.
No doubt Mr. Arlandson or those of his like are over at the CIA or the State Dept. teaching classes wherein anti-Christ through them says things like: “Now when we see in Holy Scripture Jesus saying “I am the Way and the Truth and the Life. No man cometh to the Father but by me.” what do we actually hear that God means?” to which the whole class responds on que as anti-Christ does it through them in unison ( right after they have all in unison affirmed they have free will and are most definitely not “robots”) : “Deny me at every turn in favor of other faiths as the situation dictates. And the situation dictates that as the political reality all the time.” to which anti-Christ responds through those of the ilk of Mr. Arlandson: “Very good, class. Tommorow we’ll cover twisting Holy Scripture into Certainty and see how literalists are by definition Extremists.”
Mr. Arlandson needs to write a treatise to the Democratic Party, all those of Islam and the whole occult portion of the political landscape of the United States and “conclude” that they must as a political maxum and dogma feverishly work for the absolute destruction of everything they stand for and condemn everything they themselves say they believe and have worked in past times to achieve –as the highest fulfillment of those very beliefs, no matter that they may have “privately reservations” to the contrary –that it is their duty to bring about the destruction of their own notions of governmental policy as the very fulfillment of what they mean when they say “politically correct.” He needs immediately to inform George Bush , Hillary Clinton, Obama, Kennedy and all the rest that because they genuinely, as core personal beliefs, think that non-citizens of the United States of America have an automatic right to all the benefits, jobs and cash of United States citizens, that they as holding those beliefs have a duty and highest peity to do all in their power to destroy the public expression of those very beliefs immediately. He needs to inform sodomites all that they have as the highest duty to fight against all public expression of sodomy because they are themselves sodomites.
Or perhaps Mr. Arlandson could simply stop writing at all, seeing as how he personally believes he has free will, it is his duty to write and according to his own article, it is his religious duty to fight against the purest public expression of his own beliefs. Perhaps Mr. Arlandson could even go so far as to stop worshipping “free” will and that his lack of public support for the lie of free will would be the highest possible expression of that freedom. After all, the whole premise of “free” will is that he can.
Jeremiah 23:16,17 Thus saith Jehovah of hosts: Hearken not unto the words of the prophets that prophesy unto you: they lead you to vanity; they speak a vision of their own heart, not out of the mouth of Jehovah. They say constantly unto them that despise me, Jehovah hath said, Ye shall have peace. And they say unto every one that walketh in the stubbornness of his heart, No evil shall come upon you.
In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen