A caution on the supposed automatic good of a generic “religious background”
Free willers are always blaming the other guy’s free will for their problems as if free will existed at all. Listen to anti-Christ and its all about how and what the other guy “on purpose.”
——————–
Take the lie that only one speech exists in total reality: Mix that non-creating speech in which that lie is spoken and impliciitly held forth as the foundation of all ‘religion’ and ‘truth’, with the lie of free will. Hold forth implicitly that the definition of what money IS is a functional measure of how much “free” will one has “personally” as opposed to ‘other people’. Hold forth as well, as off-shoots of the lie of free will that one’s best honesty in that one speech and as the ‘free’ will is the sole path to both salvation of soul and that salvation of soul is proved by how much ‘free’ will one has as the functional definition of divine salvation at all. Add a few parts of “the other person has cheated against the rules of how the free will is to be used ( violated the the religious system of “how and why” the free will is ideally to be used in order to preserve the Pure Free Will we were all going to get later “in heaven” on earth )” .
Shake. Or stir the pot. Pour that out on a people that have in past times lived in relative peace amongst themselves.
The result is a hatred of one’s neighbor as the people are lead astray by simply making some appear to have more “power”/”free will” ( to that audience that is being played to “power” is explicitly cash money and the things that “create wealth” such as a family, land, farms, machinery to run them, cattle, etc.. ) than others and that they-who-have-more are funtional stealers of portions of other people’s “free will/’personal power” as both explained by the “religious system” of those who have less and antagonists of it no matter what the reality is: what anti-Christ through the communists incite and call : class warfare in which “the poor” (those with supposed “less” “free” will than “others”) are the supposed moral against they immoral “rich”.
(note that setting up poverty as supposed morality and “the poor” as defined to be those with “less free will” no matter that they have plenty of clothes, plenty to eat and have plenty of shelter as automatically occupying “moral high ground” automatically consigns even those who “start out poor” and “moral” and later are defined to be “rich” as simply “no longer poor” as the SUCCESS of the system that defined all the players ( and it must say it has succeeded as a lie to even appear legitimate later..to keep going..)–to being persecuted for “immorality” by the very same system that defined them as moral in order to use them as a religious tool against a stable government. One has only to look at the phobias, making of the sheep a prey and mass murder of Romanism and communism as a witness. The free will lie always kills those it sets up to feel “less” in order by its means to make them “more” to use them to kill others as well.. it is a literal spiritual plague of demons on the people in a guise of “liberation” from “poverty”..)
2 Peter 2:18,19 For while speaking great highflown words of vanity, they allure with the lusts of the flesh, by dissoluteness, those who have just fled those who walk in error, promising them liberty, while they themselves are slaves of corruption; for by whom a man is subdued, by him is he also brought into slavery.
Bishop in Paraguay Runs for President - Forbes.com
ASUNCION, Paraguay - A charismatic leader dubbed the “Bishop of the Poor” is an early favorite to make history as the first man to serve as a Roman Catholic bishop, then be elected president of his country.
The Vatican is not pleased, and it’s not alone: …
…
Like many Paraguayans, Lugo blames the Colorados for the struggling economy, rampant corruption and politics that favor rich elites in the landlocked, agrarian nation.
“I believe the official party is responsible for the poverty, the corruption and the dishonesty in this country,” Lugo said during an interview at his brother’s home. “We need a country that’s more just and more equitable.”
Lugo, who resigned as bishop in December to sidestep Paraguay’s constitutional ban on clergy seeking office, sees politics as a solution to the problems of his former flock in the San Pedro region. He spent nearly 11 years there, ministering to hungry peasants who toil in cotton and soybean fields of rich landowners.
Lugo used his pulpit to rally the poor to help themselves. He hasn’t said exactly what he would do as president, but he said recent travels indicate people want agrarian reform, industrial production and more jobs. And in a trip to Washington, he insisted that he’s nothing like Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez.
“Chavez is a military man and I have a religious background,” Lugo told reporters. “My candidacy has arisen at the request of the people, it was born in a different way than Hugo Chavez’s.”
Set up a religious system of the lie of free will and simply let it foment for a while in the guise that it is “the only way to heaven and the best honesty in all of total reality”. Then stop being a “priest” (those so-called famous “Helpers of the Poor” as mouthpieces of anti-Christ as the lie of free will) and start being “politcal” as if you had proved there was a distinction by your “move” –at the request of the very lie taught the people by the whole host of liars in concert. Satan would call that a good day and smooth move.
Anti-Christ through the Eastern Orthodox did the same thing with Joeseph Stalin as an individual that anti-Christ now seeks to do with Paraquay as a nation. He went to an eastern orthodox seminary a young seeker and came out a monster who understood perfectly how to work the lie of free will as setting one against another as it was his best honesty that everybody had free will or at least needed to be deceived that they did in order to control them with “the necessary holy directions on how to use it for best personal and national benefit”. Now the Romanists have awakened their sleeper cell in Paraguay while the AP reports the matter as if those with “less free will” are about to get “their share” “back” as if it were about to rain righteousness in Paraquay.
As for Joe Stalin:
He graduated first in his class and at the age of 14 he was awarded a scholarship to the Seminary of Tiflis (Tbilisi, Georgia). Although his mother wanted him to be a priest (even after he had become leader of the Soviet Union), he attended seminary not because of any religious vocation, but because of the lack of locally available university education. In addition to the scholarship, Stalin was paid a small stipend for singing in the choir.
Stalin’s involvement with the socialist movement (or, to be more exact, the branch of it that later became the communist movement) began at the seminary.
The “Vatican” objects to its agent being political? Since when? It may have a “policy” on paper and make some “statements” as promoting a supposed “non-political” stance in order to make it falsely seem distinct from worldly governments, but the Romanist organization as a whole is nothing more than a crime family that is in every way nothing but political and a plague on every people overcome by them, as it always portrays worldly prosperity to be the funtional equivalent of salvation politically even as it deceives by merely seeming to eschew the trappings of “wealth” / “worldly benefits of free will” in order to seem to occupy the position of “neutral facillitator” of political passions.
And all this is happening as Hugh Hewitt ( self-proclaimed “Evangelical Roman Catholic Presbyterian”.. the free willers Modern Conglomerate) is “counseling” that a presidential candidate’s “religious background” ( specifically Mitt Romney’s Mormonism, which is simply a more overt occult child of the lie of free will..) is not to be considered as a supposed way to “use the free will properly” when voting and is in fact the “un-American way” to “use” the supposed “free” will.
Daniel 8:25 And through his cunning shall he cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he will magnify himself in his heart, and by prosperity will corrupt many; and he will stand up against the Prince of princes: but he shall be broken without hand.
In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen
Am I now come up without Jehovah against this place to destroy it? Jehovah said to me, Go up against this land and destroy it. 2 Kings 18:25
Anti-Christ tried the lie that God had sent him to conqueor Jerusalem through the Assyrians. But God says to the worshipers of demons who hate Jesus Christ and Israel: "But I know thine abode, and thy going out, and thy coming in, And thy raging against me." 2 Kings 19:27