Christian Clarity Review

If you genuinely think Mitt Romney is a self-made man who is a Mormon as an appendage to his success rather than the foundation of it, you really should look a bit deeper into the finances and who is connected with whom. Romney was always a front man for the Mormons, and is the same kind of “success story” as Joel Osteen who holds forth his own success as a tacit path to follow while in truth all the finances for his Lakewood Church and the finances of his father’s ministry before him were already on board from the beginning from occult based sources. Mom and Pop just took the bait so they could learn the secrets of His ( no, not God) supposed self-wrought, solo success to repeat for themselves. The Mormons are merely an older version of Scientologists who need a front man to sell the same lie of “self-made” success. You are supposed to pay them hard cash now to learn how to make theoretical money later by using Jesus correctly.

The whole game is that someone supposedly used their free will correctly and in such an outstanding manner as to be heroic, did it solo, and if you follow their method you can too. Or you can hire him as president so he can run the country with that same successful “method”. He will of course, need some room to put the moves on the enemy like he did in Massachusetts.

The method, for Romney turns out to be the very same old boy network of Mormons that got capital …from somewhere, and ran American Motors, Bain and Company and Bain Capital, the Marriott chain of hotels and others as well as manufacturing homosexual marriage via the office of the governor.

Two Thoughts: Howard Hughes. The Chinese.

With the company “he helped found”, Bain Capital now seeking to finance the Chinese to buy the defense contractor 3COM with American money, even before he takes office, ( at least the Clinton’s waited until they were in office to commit treason ) we can expect a “more is better” attitude toward the Chinese much in line with the Clinton era of treason and a glib “good for the economy” line to cover it over ( much in line with George Bush’s “good for America” line for every treason he commits ) . Not only will nothing change for the better, in the midst of a war and a Cold War that never ended he will do anything for money that the Mormons tell him to do in much the same vein of George Bush’s “Inexplicables” of love for Saudi Arabia, going Green, open borders at all costs and setting up new Islamic narco states as a pattern of his State Dept.

As for his much vaunted economic prowess from the Mormon mind?

“Turning around the 2002 Salt Lake Olympics”? $124.5 million in the red when you don’t count the $224.5 million ( of which $24 million was from the Federal Government ) from “private interests” to help with ’security’. Yet to this day Mormons and Friends claim “Mitt saved the day!” to keep him as a front guy that works.

Wikipedia actually has some good links on his past business practices, but has been apparently edited to smooth over any obvious bumps so that now his biography reads like one of those third person resumes written by the first person. Like the paragraphs :

“On February 11, 1999, Romney was hired as the new president and CEO of the Salt Lake Organizing Committee.[19] Romney revamped the organization’s leadership and policies, reduced budgets and boosted fundraising. He also worked to ensure the safety of the Games following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 by coordinating a $300 million security budget.[20] Despite the initial fiscal shortfall, the Games ended up clearing a profit of $100 million, not counting the $224.5 million in security costs contributed by outside sources.[21][22]

Romney contributed $1 million to the Olympics, and donated the $825,000 salary he earned as President and CEO to charity.[23] He wrote a book about his experience titled Turnaround: Crisis, Leadership, and the Olympic Games.[24]”

and

At the beginning of his governorship, Romney opposed same-sex marriage and civil unions.[55][56] Faced with the dilemma of choosing between same-sex marriage or civil unions after the November 2003 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decision legalizing same-sex marriages (Goodridge v. Department of Public Health), Romney reluctantly backed a state constitutional amendment in February 2004 that would have banned same-sex marriage but still allow civil unions, viewing it as the only feasible way to ban same-sex marriage in Massachusetts.[57] In May 2004 Romney instructed town clerks to begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, but citing a 1913 law that barred out-of-state residents from getting married in Massachusetts if their union would be illegal in their home state,[58][59] no marriage licenses were to be issued to out-of-state same-sex couples not planning to move to Massachusetts. In June 2005, Romney abandoned his support for the compromise amendment, stating that the amendment confused voters who oppose both same-sex marriage and civil unions. Instead, Romney endorsed a petition effort led by the Coalition for Marriage & Family that would have banned same-sex marriage and made no provisions for civil unions.[60] In 2006 he urged the U.S. Senate to vote in favor of the Marriage Protection Amendment.[61][62]

..which makes it seem he really opposed homosexual marriage all along. But that is not the case. In reality he mandated homosexual marriage by waffling on it exactly as George Bush has sought to do with no success so far.

Here,
is a legal and political timeline of how Romney got homosexual marriage legal exactly as he promised the homosexual community and “Log Cabin” Republicans in 1994. Through a series of actions and inactions that very definitely favored the proponents of homosexual marriage, he blocked efforts to simply enforce the law as it was already written and to write new law as a moral alien to the whole history of the United States.

Here is Alan Keyes on that same issue.

A few links from wikipeida ( showing that these things have been reported and are well known) are here
( firing workers and hiring them back at lower wages ) and Factcheck.org. ( More Mitt Missteps.) Anything that happens won’t be his fault and he will have demonstrated superior “free will” skills no doubt.

As for Mitt’s supposed benign role in the Mormon Church, Huckabee may be an ex-preacher but Mitt is an ex-”bishop” in a pretend church and ex-”high priest” as well.

Those caught in false religion are complete creatures before God that are a spirit, have a immortal soul, a heart, a mind and live in corrupt flesh at present. But in their own eyes, they are simply one big heart that wants to be happy at any cost. At best, in politics and government, all they ever attempt, as the enemy goes in and out a revolving door robbing, murdering and stealing is the mere public doing of a generically idealized ideology in exactly the same manner a child make moves in the air of a karate studio with a fierce expression and their fist at the invisible enemy while gaining loud applause and a trophy from the Polite Society of Fight Scientist known as dojo masters. While Obama, and Hillary, McCain and Romney look forward to a milkshake at McDonald’s after “the debate”, Mom and Dad are targets of opportunity of the enemy. All the presidential candidates are simply breathing in loudly through their nose, exhaling louder for the idealized duration while breaking boards at best and shouting their special word into the air in the appropriate clothing.

Mitt just shouts “Economics!” It is Mormon psy-op theater trying to get you to say what they fell for isn’t a lie.

Jesus Christ in truth is a bigot against lies and deceit cast as humble piety to deceive, in case anyone is asking. If God has grace on you, you will not learn why the Mormons have a saying amongst themselves regarding non-Mormons and business: “He was my brother and I took him in.”

Revelation 20:15 And if any one was not found written in the book of life, he was cast into the lake of fire.

Note the revelation does not say “..except all those nice people with bad theology and the good people with good theology.”

Mark 7:16 If any one have ears to hear, let him hear.

Luke 16:11-13 If therefore ye have not been faithful in the unrighteous mammon, who shall entrust to you the true? and if ye have not been faithful in that which is another’s, who shall give to you your own? No servant can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and will love the other, or he will cleave to the one and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen