Christian Clarity Review

So: Who invented the Bite? You know, that thing that enabled mankind to introduce food into their mouths and thus ..eat. The evolutionist must ask: who chewed first?

Because according to anti-Christ as evolutionists and uniformitarianists, we all ‘evolved’ and thus the technology we have today has to be the most sophisticated ever produced. But that means there had to be baby steps of pride: one person somewhere supposedly had to ‘invent’ everything. The Bite. The wheel. The outhouse. All supposed milestones in a history of ‘thought’ and supposed ‘free’ will.

The backwards compatibility rule of the lie of free will ( as supposedly proving all of those in all of history had free will all along and the way they lived and acted proved it..) is plainly seen to be a lie. If all men had free will, we should expect to see much more differentiation than we do in everything given that all people are unique from each other even in the same families; all people are distinct from all other people even in all of history. People are incapable of getting of their own individuality. Yet they always act the same over time. We find that no matter how long they lasted, how sophisticated, how ancient their roots were, all peoples at all times in history endure the very same lies and deceits, go through the same problems and no matter how they tried to get out of them –those lies and deceits are still here. Rather than see the will is not free and the environment that that will must live in is the same, and the lack of differentiation is absolute evidence of that, the evolutionists seeks to portray the lack of differentiation as proof of free will ( it doesn’t make sense. They just keep keep implying it..) and thus seek supposed milestones in ‘free’ willed thought as that differentiation. Note that they seek not a differentiation of the people as important, but only of ‘ideas’ expressed through the people. ( which is Buddhism/witchcraft : “spiritual evolution”..)

To that end, supposedly, one person came up with the wheel –and this was supposedly some sort of milestone in human thought. ( que music from Arthur Clark’s 2001 as it …rolls!) Such is the theater of the lie as supposed best honesty, now we are supposed to be proud white people have been in ancient China so we can claim that white people gave the Chinese the first metal instruments and the wheel and thus trump the Chinese notion of superiority in technology and the supposed ’science of civilization’ they love to think ‘they did first’. Two deceived people fighting over a widget of pride makes two deceived people: not a ‘prize’ to be won for bragging rights. Both deceived people claim that it took both their ancestors thousands of years to come up with a wheel and both would see that wheel as such a giant intellectual leap as to make of themselves mere midgets by comparison. Yet all this is done simply as theater to hold up the backwards compatibility of the lie of free will with all of history as if the LIE were not there, but the supposed evidence of those of the past actually having free will.

Is it simply a mystery as to where they came from? Why they were there? Of course not. It’s a widget of the lie of free will to make it seem historically inevitable and logical in the guise of racism. And this was back in 1994.

excepted from: The Mummies of Xinjiang

Where exactly did these apparent Caucasians come from? And what were they doing at remote desert oases in central Asia?

Any answers to these questions will most likely fuel a wide- ranging debate about the role outsiders played in the rise of Chinese civilization. As far back as the second century B.C., Chinese texts refer to alien peoples called the Yuezhi and the Wusun, who lived on China’s far western borders; the texts make it clear that these people were regarded as troublesome “barbarians.” Until recently, scholars have tended to downplay evidence of any early trade or contact between China and the West, regarding the development of Chinese civilization as an essentially homegrown affair sealed off from outside influences; indeed, this view is still extremely congenial to the present Chinese regime. Yet some archeologists have begun to argue that these supposed barbarians might have been responsible for introducing into China such basic items as the wheel and the first metal objects. Exactly who these central Asian outsiders might have been, however–what language they spoke and where they came from–is a puzzle. No wonder, then, that scholars see the discovery of the blond mummies as a sensational new clue.

————–

Did you know that the nation of Islam believes that white people showed up after black people were already here and thus have thwarted the black people’s free will ever since?

That is not a joke.

excerpted from the wikipedia notation on Nation of Islam

“The Blackman is the original man. From him came all brown, yellow, red, and white people. By using a special method of birth control law, the Blackman was able to produce the white race. This method of birth control was developed by a Black scientist known as Yakub, who envisioned making and teaching a nation of people who would be diametrically opposed to the Original People. A Race of people who would one day rule the original people and the earth for a period of 6,000 years. Yakub promised his followers that he would graft a nation from his own people, and he would teach them how to rule his people, through a system of tricks and lies whereby they use deceit to divide and conquer, and break the unity of the darker people, put one brother against another, and then act as mediators and rule both sides.” [9]

Those sneaky white people! Introducing to those who wrote the Nation of Islam’s doctrines the ‘truth’ of ‘free’ will and then thwarting that very ‘free’ will. Giving the Asians the wheel and the concept of metal tools…and the lie of free will so that the Asians would have to claim they came up with everything independently or that in fact the West got civilization from them? For what?

Once you know it is a lie you have to ask: where did it come from and why? What is it? ( plainly it is non-creating speech/anti-Christ as a lying spirit that is the whole speech of fallen man introduced to Man in the garden: it is serpent speak/dragon speak.. ( the Chinese to this day celebrate the new year by getting inside a dragon and dancing..) But when you are deceived there is only non-creating speech in total reality, you have to keep saying “huh? what?” no matter how many times you are told the truth by Jesus Christ to hold on to the deceptions you already have..)

The lie of free will is so ridiculous as to be laughable. Yet it is the best honesty of all those in it. They are not kidding. They will literally go to war over an intricacy of the lie –exactly as their ancestors while saying their ancestors were intellectual giants thwarted by the ‘other side’ and the supposed backwards compatibility of the lie of ‘free’ will with ‘history’ ‘proves’ it.

Isaiah 6:5-8 And I said, Woe unto me! for I am undone; for I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips: for mine eyes have seen the King, Jehovah of hosts. And one of the seraphim flew unto me, and he had in his hand a glowing coal, which he had taken with the tongs from off the altar; and he made it touch my mouth, and said, Behold, this hath touched thy lips; and thine iniquity is taken away, and thy sin expiated. And I heard the voice of the Lord saying, Whom shall I send, and who will go for us? And I said, Here am I; send me.

Ecc 7:8-12 Better is the end of a thing than its beginning; better is a patient spirit than a proud spirit. Be not hasty in thy spirit to be vexed; for vexation resteth in the bosom of fools. Say not, How is it that the former days were better than these? for thou dost not inquire wisely concerning this. Wisdom is as good as an inheritance, and profitable to them that see the sun. For wisdom is a defence as money is a defence; but the excellency of knowledge is, that wisdom maketh them that possess it to live.

John 8:41-47 Ye do the works of your father. They said therefore to him, We are not born of fornication; we have one father, God. Jesus said to them, If God were your father ye would have loved me, for I came forth from God and am come from him ; for neither am I come of myself, but *he* has sent me. Why do ye not know my speech? Because ye cannot hear my word. Ye are of the devil, as your father, and ye desire to do the lusts of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has not stood in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks falsehood, he speaks of what is his own; for he is a liar and its father: and because I speak the truth, ye do not believe me. Which of you convinces me of sin? If I speak truth, why do ye not believe me? He that is of God hears the words of God: therefore ye hear them not, because ye are not of God.

Mark 4:23 If any one have ears to hear, let him hear.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen