Christian Clarity Review

July 13, 2009

Environmentalism is Fascism: Part Two

In the effort to make organic gardening the standard for farming, organically supplying the soil with nutrients is all the rage. The simple formula goes like this: you plant a garden and recycle all your waste back into the garden and presto: you can recycle in perpetuity and produce the same food amount.

But that is an invalid argument — a lie — when seen in reality.

These things are very obvious and are on a certain level so obvious that they are obnoxious to state or read. Yet they need to be brought up again and again as anti-Christ seeks to make his own common sense of a love of death the common sense of all.

When you only recycle organic components back into soil, you have to get what you consumed as food from somewhere else to keep the same amount of nutrients available to the plants. You can supplement the plant wastes with other organic sources: leaf litter, wood chips, your neighbor’s organic wastes, kelp/sea products, etc. Everyone else who gardens is going after those same supplements. Over time, the forest will be stripped of leaf litter, and other organic sources will be exhausted –and this is the point –the more the population grows. –the more people garden and the more people need food.

The revolution in agriculture was the advent of chemical fertilizer.

Estimates vary, but some figures put the boost in productivity in food output when chemical fertilizers are added to the soil as eight times what you would have gotten without them. The benefit of the chemical/inorganic fertilizer is essentially that you can take minerals and rocks and add them to the soil and by-pass the need for much of the organic additives necessary to sustain the output in keeping with a growing population.

Note: per an email that said:

“some posts of yours are a little rashly spoken. .. Not sure, what you mean by “nutrients”. Plants do not live off of organic matter, except mushrooms. All organic matter is finally broken down into water and CO2. Plants take in water, CO2 und sun light and produce carbohydrates, fat, proteins etc. They take none of that from the soil, except: mushrooms do. In addition to water, plants take some minerals from the soil. That is all. That is the complete story.”

answering that email plus:

We’re in unison on the need for inorganics in gardening.farming:

The nutrients spoken of are not necessarily for the plant but for the ground to produce an overall environment in which the plant can get the nutrients it needs in the form that is usable to the plant. So, okay, the word ‘nutrient’ may be a confusing term. A LOT of chemistry is going on and most of that chemistry is not understood. The RESULTS of adding certain non-organic materials is plain and cannot be denied and that result and understanding is the revolution: that you don’t have to keep putting back organic/remains-of-living-plants as supplements –as the lie of enviro-fascism keeps saying. That nutrients are used by each crop and need to be replaced are without dispute. As someone once told me when we were both within the lie of free will: “If you can get used to the idea, you are actually fertilizing the soil, not the plant.” I don’t farm commercially, but I have had a garden most of my life and been around others who have as well in addition to having the Spirit of Christ in me now.

Inorganic fertilizers are proved as nutrients to the plants themselves in addition to the soil in the test that they work equally as well in hydroponic systems ( adding a mix of inorganics to otherwise ‘pure’ water ) and mist/air systems, not just in soil-farming so to speak.

Anything can be abused, and that abuse is a direct result of being in an environment in which non-creating speech exists because it is a poison on the soul while growing the heart of the flesh as the lie of free will. That poison as regards chemical fertilizers/inorganics goes like this: “I have a desire. I am in complete control of myself and all around me that other people don’t control with their free will. I want my desire to be obtained as quickly and with as little expense to me as possible. I wish to grow a garden/field of food. If a little chemical fertilizer is good for a slow but good result, more of that substance will give me a better, more bountiful and possibly faster result.” So the recommended amounts and SOIL TESTS are ignored in favor of DESIRE.

That’s not a hatred of the earth, that’s trying to care for the earth in a way to bend that caring and the earth to an ideology of free will ( and making money within it ) that is a lie ; no matter what is obtained it can never satisfy –and in those deceptions, everything other than the lie of free will gets the blame: the earth, you, your neighbor, etc… The harm to the environment is from the ideology/spirit of the lie of free will and the ignorance of the distinction between Jesus Christ as Creating Word of God and non-creating speech/anti-Christ as a spirit of never-enoughness in the people. It isn’t the “environment’s” fault you aren’t getting what you want and trying to force it by any means –even a rejection of things that in being abused harmed the overall environment you were trying to force your way– will not work to gain desires that have all along been lies you were deceived into thinking were true for other people and that they were happy within them and you just couldn’t make them ‘work’. If you go for the ‘organic’ foods, and if you are an enviro-facist, you are being seduced to literal ruin on the premise you and all people can control-your-way to Utopia. You will only destroy yourself and others in a false desire that will never come true.

end update/edit..

I.E. God has sent a benefit specifically to address population growth. You get the blessing as you go in faith. Chemical/inorganic fertilizers are just one proof of that among an innumerable amount of such proofs. The inorganic fertilizer enables the population to keep growing without stealing organic supplements from another source to add to the farmland in addition to boosting the output (at the least, taking as only half the stated benefit above) more than four times from that same ground than what organic supplements could have done.

This is in addition and separate from the issue of seeds bred to merely satisfy a marketing ‘necessity’ at the expense of good nutrition. Longer lasting on the shelf, bigger, cuter, tenderer or simply a better color does not equate to even an equal level of nutrition from the otherwise same species of crop or livestock. Anti-Christ will have you think all women ought to at least wish they could eat pink vegetables so he could sell them everything from flavored spray that turns their food pink to actual laws that say it is a discrimination issue if a certain percentage of the food isn’t grown to be pink. “Organic” is simply the latest trend in that area to fuel the lie of free will and its desires in the area of private and public life that is food.

Those who are encapsulated in anti-Christ have an outlook and agenda of scarcity because anti-Christ as their sole speech cannot create anything. They do not want enough food for all. The ‘organic’ ploy is to manufacture a crisis that has already been solved by chemical fertilizers. They merely want to seem to make valid their own outlook ( that is founded in the speech that can create nothing and in a worship of that speech as if it were the only speech in total reality ) that “more people equals crisis” and to lie in the guise of science to make it seem that science supports their lying phobias that are only a result of the limitations of their own speech. Thus Pelosi is only saying what to her is common sense in Roman Catholicism as worship of non-creating speech and the lie of free will within it: the only ‘proper’ way to ’solve the crisis’ is ..less people. Less children.

Roman Catholicism in particular has a long history of population control initiatives including homosexuality and lesbianism and are always found to be involved in starting wars. In that mindset, being ‘right’ lets them sleep at night. They think they have an infallible logic that mandates the death of children, the aged, and anyone who is weak or doesn’t ‘use the free will’ the ‘proper’ way on the assumption that there is no other speech than non-creating speech.

Many people are very deceived when they hear the Roman Catholic Church is anti-Christ. They have been trained that saying so is just the hysteria of a certain group of persons who are simply proud of their own tradition and that the anti-Christian label is just hype. Nothing could be further from the truth. The Roman Catholic Church is nothing more than the institutionalizing of the common sense of non-creating speech and its emotional common sense as dogma and therein is its anti-Christian character: if not for the lie of human free will as pop Christianity, the Romanists would very plainly be seen as anti-Christ.

If that were not bad enough on its own, ( that she desires the death of infants to serve the lies of the Romanist doctrines ) Pelosi, as a Catholic, will then see as a ‘national security issue’ that she has to kill as many other nation’s children as possible so there won’t be so many of them in case we have to fight them. Thus the reasoning of the fascist Democratic and Republican parties in funding world wide population control agendas and actions in any way they can through Obama. Thus the support for Obama’s population control agenda…by Romanists.

False love of the earth as Environmentalism ( which is si9mple code for “down with chemical fertilizers!” ) is merely one arm of a much larger lie that exist to do nothing more than kill people under any guise possible. It is in very smooth cooperation with the outlook in economics that make as many as possible see paper money or money at all as an idol to be worshiped and in that worship to sacrifice children to it.

No matter how often it is proven to women that abortion in no way enhances their quality of life, they keep killing children and yanking out their wombs on the express premise that their quality of life will be better if they appease what they suppose to be The Power and Ideology of their day. No matter how often fascists and socialistic schemes of government are shown to be satanic and thus unable to perform what they promise no matter how often such schemes fail as economic policy, women vote for it after they have struck the womb in the deception that they will get a benefit from that very particular economic policy.

Environmentalism is fascism in a guise to do human emotion correctly by destroying the means to grow eight times more food from the same soil without having to steal organic supplements from somewhere else.

Do not be deceived and do not give place to the devil. He would love a return to mandatory, public, child sacrifice and dancing around the woods naked in a demonic hysteria.

Proverbs 26:18,19 As a mad man who casteth firebrands, arrows, and death, So is the man that deceiveth his neighbour, and saith, Am not I in sport?

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://christianclarityreview.wpblogs.com/2009/07/13/environmentalism-is-fascism-part-two/trackback/

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>