Christian Clarity Review

A note on the common pattern of speaking of the same spirit of lies: one in the name of “Al–h” and the other in the name of (basically ) No-Name / Community.

The standard pattern is to appeal to you in conversation “via” someone not present, but on the assumption that the mere appeal is actual proof that any doubts that come to you should be seen as impious because someone else once had those same doubts and those specific doubts were answered within the same doctrinal/theological terms you are already supposed to understand.

Supposedly, the one to whom the appeal is made is an authority figure in the religion/system and that person was satisfied and spiritually made whole by the answer given. What is being attempted the whole time is to give those who listen a new list of terms that will become the shorthand / handy guide / verbal abecedary (from wikipedia: Abecediaries are generally considered to be medieval teaching aids, particularly for the illiterate. The alphabet may have been thought to possess supernatural powers along the lines of the runic alphabet. Each letter would have had a symbolic meaning to the devout. ..a Christian example would be “a is for apple, b is for boy” to teach the english alphabet, etc. There have been many false Christian abecedaries.. ).

The new terms of the religion are simply the new alphabet for the illiterate newbie that the leadership can say without having to go through the initial/introductory conversations again in order to hurry the victim along towards total destruction. Once the need for the new alphabet has been implied, ( and the need for it is implied in simply speaking it at all ) then no end of deceptions will be put forth and any inconsistencies are simply held forth to be Mysteries of the Faith that are answered by more terms or the same terms arranged in a different order.

It is the introduction of lying spirits as new terms of the religion seen through the lens of the deception of human free will: language itself is ( falsely) understood as terms/words being will-neutral nothings ( as part of an overall will-neutral environment in which it is at least possible for human free will to exist..) that the hearer must, (in supposed free will and as making the lie of human free will seem logically consistent) , organize correctly and use in the proper manner in the guise of “doing” human free will. It is the plain instilling of demons: the new terms are simply the names of demons and/or legions of demons while the slave is told words are something over which he or she has complete power as part of the supposed logical perfection of the lie of human free will.

Note as well that the lie of human free will is the underlying assumption of both systems: the “responsibility” is yours to literally do thoughts correctly so that correct acts will follow and the whole religious system is nothing more than a mapping out of how to accomplish that and arrive at landmarks-of-thought via “the terms” .. as the same creature you already are and with a new emotional scheme of how to feel about everything that differs from where you started as a sign of maturity within the system. The demonic activity as the new emotional intelligence/rubric is held forth to be The Good.

Notes as well that Islam has stolen its phrasing from Buddhism exactly as it is presently trying to steal “concepts of Calvinism” from Christianity in order to claim a “Islamic Calvinism”/determinism.

Islamic circular lies in an asked-and-answered format:

.. from the Russian, and from a post that claims miracles in Afghanistan as evidence of the real “power” of Islam and its god. Supposedly, bodies don’t rot; the birds help out the mujaheen; ammunition is miraculously saved.., “many instances” of each miracle occur, etc. The post is organized into a “doctrine, ( “how to recognize miracles and why they don’t happen to you but only those who are far advanced in the Islamic Religious System from a ‘theological’ standpoint..”) ..then application of that theological doctrine to your life in order to understand the supposed personal experience of the Faithful.. this portion is taken from the doctrinal/’theological’ part that basically explains what Islamic miracles are, the different classes of miracles, how to distinguish them from “Satanic” lookalikes, that they happen more often these days as compared to olden days, and ..why.)

“Imam Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “We admit Karamata awliya, unlike Mu’tazila” Also, Karamata Aulia not happen on their own volition and will. Maulyana Ashraf Ali Sanvi explains: “Karamata and Mudzhiza not occur by a person - that Wali or Nabi can not create a miracle. This happens only when God in His wisdom decided to show it is a miracle “

Asked and answered. Explained. Just for you.

“Abu Yazid Bista said: “If you see the flying man, or walking on the surface of the water, do not be deceived by them until you see how its actions comply with sharia…Yunus bin Abdul Alia Imam Shafi said: “Have you heard what I said our friend Laish bin Sad? He said if you see a person walking on the water surface, and thus he is a follower of his passions, do not believe him. “

“Imam Shafi said: “Laish understood the essence. If you see people following their desires, which flies through the air, then do not be deceived by this. “

ancillary: A note to Muslims reading this: what “Iman Shafi” and “Laish bin Sad” just said was that if you really feel passion and a love for going out and killing people, for any reason, you should not do this. It would be a spectacular thing with the wrong motives.To do so is satanic. If you do, whatever you did will be ignored by Allah because you were passionate and zealous about it. Even if you get killed doing it. No heaven for you.

The only conclusion is that the Imans strive to instill that exact evil passion in their followers in order to steal the ‘kingdom’ from the lesser persons who are sent out to die ..in order that Allah not allow the deceived into the “spiritual kingdom”. I.E. To trick people into doing evil things so that they cannot go to heaven, so there will be more room and more delights for the Imams.

Jehovah took vengeance on Israel because the Levitical priesthood and the false prophets saw the truth and tried to keep the kingdom to themselves by lying and killing ( Luke 11:52 Woe unto you, the doctors of the law, for ye have taken away the key of knowledge; yourselves have not entered in, and those who were entering in ye have hindered. ..Matthew 21:38 But the husbandmen, seeing the son, said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him and possess his inheritance. ) ..as do the Jews within Judaism to this day. Imans are themselves deceived and yet seek to keep the Islamic ‘kingdom’ for themselves by lying to those they deceive into being martyrs.

And in the midst of all these quotes of Islamic “Theology”? A defense of that same theology:

Hazrat Dzhunayd said: “Our knowledge is limited to the Quran and Sunnah. Anyone who does not read the Koran and the Hadith does not pass, what would be wrong to speak of our knowledge “

I. E. If you don’t have the Master Abcedary, how can you understand its claims? You have to do it understand it. Anyone not doing it ..can’t prove it is false. ..so they say. And if you are doing it in passion or zealotry, you won’t go to heaven. But you must also have that same passion and zealotry to prove you understood the Imams.

I.E. Islam is nonsensical and self-invalidating.

For a lie, the post itself is it is pretty complete as a whole religious doctrine even though its premise is that it is based on another doctrine somewhere else ( the koran). ( Use google translate, etc to get the whole show. ) There is what you would expect from a lie claiming to be religion/metaphysics: ways to see good and evil and distinguish them from each other; ways to know what the righteous is thinking and what the evil people are thinking in the midst of their actions and as proof of the veracity of the Meta that is Islam to understand such things by giving particulars on them; general “will-neutral” directions on how to recognize as truth the underlying claims of the system so you will run out and do what the Martyrs did and testify from the dead as to the veracity of what Imans say. Just don’t be passionate about it.

Compare the pattern of asked-and-answered to Buddhism and the theft of rhetorical patterns as religious indoctrination method is plainly seen:

from: The Basics of Buddhist Meditation

Ananda, Buddha’s cousin, friend, and devoted disciple, once asked him if there was one particular quality one should cultivate that would best bring one to full awakening. Buddha answered: Being mindful of breathing.

from: About Buddhism

The Nyingma lama, HH Khenpo Jigme Phuntsok, was once asked to summarize the Buddhist path in one sentence. Without hesitation, he replied, Perfect yourself, then help others to do the same.

from: Homosexuality and Theravada Buddhism

Someone once asked the Buddha how after his death it would be possible to know what was and was not his authentic teaching and he replied: “The doctrines of which you can say: ‘These doctrines lead to letting go, giving up, stilling, calming, higher knowledge, awakening and to Nirvana’ - you can be certain that they are Dhamma, they are discipline, they are the words of the Teacher.”

In the asked-and-answered motif, demons are instilled and all your doubts should supposedly be immobilized and you should placed on the path the teachers wish in addition to simply pointing you to Source of Knowledge so you won’t have to bother Teacher anymore with the same questions. All that takes place in a speech that can create nothing and which seeks to use its powerlessness as a supposed proof of your free will, thereby hiding its worthlessness in an emotional positive for you.

How does this differ from Christ Jesus/Word of God/ Creating Speech? God Speaks as Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit and you are created in Him as Word, Truth and Way. There is not a path that is not-Christ that supposedly ends up as your righteousness in front of Christ in His eyes. ALL other paths are specifically said to be lies and the way of thieves and murderers.

John 10:1-7 Verily, verily, I say to you, He that enters not in by the door to the fold of the sheep, but mounts up elsewhere, *he* is a thief and a robber; but he that enters in by the door is the shepherd of the sheep. To him the porter opens; and the sheep hear his voice; and he calls his own sheep by name, and leads them out. When he has put forth all his own, he goes before them, and the sheep follow him, because they know his voice. But they will not follow a stranger, but will flee from him, because they know not the voice of strangers. This allegory spoke Jesus to them, but they did not know what it was of which he spoke to them. Jesus therefore said again to them, Verily, verily, I say to you, I am the door of the sheep.

In Christ, there is no room for interpretational wiggling within a falsely idealized speech in which what is said has no effect in order that the will can be idealized to ‘remain’ free in the presence of all speech. All lies of ‘higher criticism’ / free willism / arminianism ( in which language is idealized to be exactly what Islam and Buddhism claim it to be in order to keep up pretenses that the will is free and that they get to control their own religion..) were taken from Buddhism and other witch-crafts within non-creating speech/anti-Christ and have always been lies.

The mere appeal to false religious texts and various interpreters of them, as well as the asked-and-answered format within it is a compounded lie and could only take place in a speech that can create nothing. Christ as Creating Word/ Word of God does not appeal. There is no gospel “offer”. There is no Decisional Regeneration, no will-neutral medium in which to hear and then “decide to obey.” No “earn heaven” scenario. Thus there is no need for the methods of manipulating desire as is constantly found in Islam, Judaism, Buddhism and all other false religion.

Roman Catholicism and the like have always been false Christianity. Thus those pagans who see similarities between their own lies and those of Roman Catholics and Byzantines ( Eastern Orthodox) and the free willed based false versions of Protestantism are deceptions. It is obvious that pagans favor false Christianity expressly because of its similarity to their own beliefs and thus find hypocrisy within it in its claims to be Divine and supernatural in a “whatever you say I can say and you have no right to refute me because we all come from the same philosophical background”. It is the toy Christiantiy they prefer to make fun of , the straw man they like to knock down. In particular, false Christians as American politicians ( all of the presidents for at least the last twenty, the Supreme Court, U.S. governmental bureaucracy and House and Senate for over 100 years.. ) have been pro-Christ, pro-Pope, pro-free will, anti-Calvinism false Christians who have delighted in immorality as Public Christianity. Those are the immoral giants the pagans love to tag with the world “Christian.”

Even the hypocrisy which other pagans than false Christians say Christianity ‘is’ ( and as if it were true Christianity ) is based on its failure to bring and secure in perpetuity emotional positives within the same arena of emotions that all false religions desire: it has no proven utility to keep the current definition of money as a measure of free will AND morality as protecting human life and happiness intact. That is the sum of all the complaints: ‘it’ doesn’t work and doesn’t work specifically to do what they want to do with religion as a tool.

Yet it is FALSE Christianity because it claims to do just that and thus draws the charge of hypocrisy in failing to perform. And that is also the deception: becuase they are deceived as to what and Who Christ Jesus is it seems to be that when Christ points them out as pagans and unbelievers, that what he is pointing out is their failure to perform the very things their own own religion accuses false Christiantiy of not performing. In reality, He is specifically saying they all have the same assumptions, the same lies, the same deceptions that have nothing to do with the truth. He is not at all saying he will perform what they wanted out of their own religion; He is saying what they wanted and the system in which they were seduced to desire anything is evil and corrupt and that they must be saved out it. He is not at all trying to perform what they say is the only utility for religion. Yet that utility is exactly what versions of Christianity based on the lie of human free will seek to perform.

Thus as a maxim, a false Christian is not simply deceived, but is a worse deceiver than any other in that they turn others to the vanity of false accusations as a lifestyle and think themselves justified before their false version of God –minus the blood of Jesus Christ and minus new birth in Christ — simply to find hypocrisy within the lie that is false Christianity as the lie of human free will.

The whole “chose your religion” scenario is that you chose one over another for the utility of gaining all the emotional positives that they all collectively say exist. As a whole, it is the witness of all false religion that the current definition of money, the current models of government-based-on-free-will to get and keep that money and the things it can buy have always and will always exist and that only within those meta-definitions like money will you find a way to heaven. They must say so because they cannot create anything.

The supposed hatred and rejection of worldly wealth by monks and jihadists and the like is simply a way for poor people to eat, drink and have shelter. A few Rich Names are to be found among them, but only for the propaganda value of such so that masses of the poor will be killed in war or fed by silent service to those of the religious system.

In Christ, there is no mercy for the hardened pagan who hears not the Word of God. The Islamic, the false Christian, the Hindu, The Judaic, the Jainist and the Buddhist all stumble on in relative safety of being refuted by each other and see that inability to master each other as signs of some grain of truth in their respective systems because they all share the same lies and thus the same hypocrisies. But in Christ, they are condemned because they have not hearkened to the Word of God, but desired to listen constantly to a speech they were deceived they could control for an advantageous emotional outcome for themselves within current metas of money and government. It is easy to see the result: Islam fosters homosexuality while killing the homosexuals of other interpretations of non-creating speech; there is no change of being, no new life in the Word of God/Jesus Christ for any of them, only constant very, very, very precise ‘holy directions’ that adjust the mis–interpretations of others. Buddhism fosters a complete disregard for life and individuality by having a moral-less religion while claiming to protect life and a certain aspect of emotional charm. All are fallen in a free willed, earn-heaven scenario that could only take place in a speech which can create nothing. Thus, scarcity is their only rule in conjunction with the simultaneous protection of certain scarcities as good scarcities ( evil is supposed scarce in their system –that’s supposedly a ‘good’ scarcity ) as ‘morals’ and the denigration of other scarcities as an evil lack of necessary resources ( food, peace, emotion, land, governmental control, etc..), that lack brought on by the actions that spring out of the mis-interpreting of reality by their religious competitors.

Psalm 82:5 They know not, neither do they understand; they walk on in darkness: all the foundations of the earth are moved.

Proverbs 4:19 The way of the wicked is as darkness: they know not at what they stumble.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen